The End of the Green Line—Two Views

The End of the Green Line—Two Views

The erasure of the infamous Green Line separating Israel from the occupied Palestinian territories represents a seismic shift in the political reality of this land.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

TEL AVIV, ISRAEL-PALESTINE—On the face of it, there are few pressing reasons for Americans to take any interest in what is happening in Israel-Palestine/Palestine-Israel. From the climate catastrophe to the war in Ukraine, from the energy crisis to the crisis of democracy—Americans have plenty of reasons to be preoccupied.

This somewhat understandable American apathy was apparent in Joe Biden’s visit to our region in July. The US president, much like his predecessors, felt no need to pressure Israel on its military occupation; to force it back into negotiations with the Palestinian leadership; to visit the Masafer Yatta region of the occupied West Bank, where over 1,000 Palestinians are facing imminent ethnic cleansing; or even to hold Israel to account for the killing of the Palestinian American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh. And just this past weekend, Biden essentially greenlit yet another Israeli attack on Gaza, saying nothing about the unnecessary violence or about the 15 year long siege which has devastated the strip

Yet as the United States focuses elsewhere, the reality on the ground is changing. For Palestinians and Israelis alike, the Green Line—the 1949 armistice border that many view as the basis for a future two-state solution—has all but disappeared. For over a decade, under both former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the past year’s “government of change,” Israel has supercharged its de facto annexation of the West Bank, further entrenching a one-state reality between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This has recently prompted leading Israeli and international human rights organizations, from B’Tselem to Human Rights Watch to Amnesty International, to accept what Palestinians have long said: that the Israeli regime is one of apartheid in every corner of the land under its control: from the river to the sea, including the Gaza Strip, which Israel still controls through its siege policies and its grip on the Gazan civilian register, water and electricity infustrcutrue, currency and more. It is this regime and the war crimes it carries out that uninterested American citizens are continuing to fund, all while their government sanctions Russia for similar crimes in Ukraine.

The erasure of the Green Line is a seismic shift in the political reality of this land, which is precisely why these two articles, by Palestinian and Israeli journalists and activists Amjad Iraqi and Meron Rapoport, are so timely. The two serve as editors in a unique ecosystem of independent journalism: Iraqi at +972 Magazine, which offers news and analysis about Palestine-Israel in English for an international audience, and Rapoport at Local Call, which does the same in Hebrew for Israeli readers. These are the only media outlets in the country that are run jointly by Israeli and Palestinian journalists, and they are grounded in an unequivocal commitment to fair journalism and anti-apartheid activism. And as the two articles in this issue show, these journalists’ parallel yet complementary interpretations of what the Green Line’s erasure means for the future of the land between the river and the sea are essential to understanding the full story—and to charting a course for change rooted in justice, equality, and liberation.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x