Politics / April 2, 2025

Democracy 1, Elon Musk 0

The richest man in the world attempted to buy an election in Wisconsin. His effort crashed and burned, establishing a model for the fight against Trumpism.

John Nichols
Susan Crawford, flanked by Wisconsin Supreme Court justices, accepts victory in her race for Wisconsin Supreme Court justice on April 01, 2025 in Madison, Wisconsin.

Susan Crawford accepts victory in her race for Wisconsin Supreme Court justice on April 1, 2025, in Madison, Wisconsin.

(Scott Olson / Getty Images)

Two days before Wisconsinites went to the polls in an election he tried to buy—with more than $25 million in spending to benefit a right-wing state Supreme Court candidate, and an expensive effort to mobilize voters against what he claimed was “judicial activism”—Elon Musk jetted into Green Bay and said, “This is one of those things that may not seem that it’s going to affect the entire destiny of humanity, but I think it will.”

Musk gets a lot wrong. But let’s hope he was right about the importance of Tuesday’s election.

Because, last night, voters across the nation’s ultimate battleground state, from urban centers and college towns, suburbs and rural communities, delivered a stunning rebuke to Musk’s money. But not just that: to President Donald Trump’s crude attacks on the progressive candidate in the court contest, and Republican efforts to make the race a referendum on the independent judiciary that the oligarchs in Washington—including a billionaire president and the richest man in the world, who serves as his slashing-and-burning “special government employee”—seek to disempower.

Dane County Circuit Judge Susan Crawford, the candidate supported by progressive US Senator Tammy Baldwin, labor unions, supporters of abortion rights and LGBTQ rights, and the resurgent Wisconsin Democratic Party, defeated former attorney general Brad Schimel, the candidate of Trump, Musk, corporate interests, and the state Republican Party, by an overwhelming 55–45 margin.

Crawford’s win entrenched the existing 4–3 progressive majority on the powerful state Supreme Court, which is now expected to take up crucial cases on abortion rights, labor rights, and voting rights. That was a big deal. But the election was just as important because of where it took place: a state that Trump narrowly won last November.

US Representative Mark Pocan (D-WI) summed that message up when he explained on Tuesday night, “Today’s election in Wisconsin for the Supreme Court was a referendum on Elon Musk and Donald Trump and the Republican Party’s actions nationally. People don’t want programs cut for the middle class and [they don’t want] to give tax breaks to Trump and Musk. We spoke out. They lost. End of discussion.”

For his part, Musk immediately tried to pretend that he hadn’t cared all that much about the outcome of a race he had previously said “might decide the future of America and Western Civilization!” Instead, he said that Wisconsinites’ decision to enshrine a voter-ID amendment into their Constitution was “the most important thing” that happened on Tuesday, despite the fact that the state has already had a voter-ID requirement on the books for nearly a decade.

Celebrating her victory, Crawford, a onetime lawyer for labor unions and Planned Parenthood who was mounting her first statewide campaign, recalled her roots in a working-class community in western Wisconsin, saying, “Growing up in Chippewa Falls, I never could have imagined that I would be taking on the richest man in the world for justice in Wisconsin.… And we won.”

Crawford had proven to be a brilliant contender during the course of what became the most expensive state court race in American history. Candidates, parties, and political action committees are expected to have burned through $100 million when all the receipts are in, with at least $25 million of that coming from Musk alone.

Crawford was widely seen as the winner of the single debate with her opponent, whom she referred to as “Elon Schimel.” She kept her cool as Musk wrote bigger and bigger checks and Trump labeled her a “Radical Left Democrat.” And she framed the result of her race in precisely the right terms.

Current Issue

Cover of March 2026 Issue

“Today Wisconsinites fended off an unprecedented attack on our democracy, our fair elections, and our Supreme Court,” Crawford told her cheering supporters. “And Wisconsin stood up and said loudly that justice does not have a price, our courts are not for sale.”

There was no hyperbole in that statement. The race to fill an open seat on the court, following the decision of progressive Justice Ann Walsh Bradley to retire, was always going to be consequential. It was destined to determine whether progressives or conservatives would control the state Supreme Court. And the decision of Musk and Trump to intervene on behalf of Schimel made it the clearest referendum yet on the first months of Trump’s second term. There was never any question that a Schimel win would be read as a vindication for Trump’s authoritarian agenda. It would have suggested that the richest man in the world’s money could not be beaten at the ballot box.

But Wisconsin had other ideas. Throw in Tuesday’s comfortable victory for Jill Underly—a rural progressive who was bidding for a new term as state superintendent of public instruction against a challenge from a well-financed, Republican-backed supporter of school vouchers—and it was clear that the state was not just deciding officially nonpartisan statewide contests. It was rising up against the oligarchic excesses coming out of Washington and delivering a wake-up call for Republicans and Democrats nationwide.

“Voters are furious at what Elon Musk and Donald Trump are doing to this country,” declared the dynamic Democratic Party of Wisconsin chair, Ben Wikler, shortly after the results were known. For Democrats thinking of running for national, state or local posts, said Wikler, “this is the time to run.” For Republicans who are thinking about running, Wikler added, “Any politician allied with them could swiftly face the end of their political career.”

“Tonight,” continued Wikler, “Democrats got up off the mat and fought back. The world’s richest man tried to buy Wisconsin’s democracy in order to corrupt Wisconsin’s judiciary, but Wisconsinites demonstrated that our state is not for sale. In a moment of national darkness, Wisconsin voters lit a candle. Let the lesson of Wisconsin’s election ring out across the country: Hope is not lost, democracy can yet survive, and the voice of the American people will not be silenced.”

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

John Nichols

John Nichols is the executive editor of The Nation. He previously served as the magazine’s national affairs correspondent and Washington correspondent. Nichols has written, cowritten, or edited over a dozen books on topics ranging from histories of American socialism and the Democratic Party to analyses of US and global media systems. His latest, cowritten with Senator Bernie Sanders, is the New York Times bestseller It's OK to Be Angry About Capitalism.

More from The Nation

Kamala Harris, campaigning in Washington, DC, faces protests from hundreds of people expressing disapproval of her administration's Gaza policy, on October 29, 2024.

We Don’t Need an Autopsy to Tell Us the Democrats Failed on Gaza We Don’t Need an Autopsy to Tell Us the Democrats Failed on Gaza

The DNC is allegedly hiding a report showing that Kamala Harris’s Gaza policy helped cost her the 2024 election. But that report won’t tell us anything we don’t already know.

James Zogby

Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico at a March 2 rally in Houston

Texas’s Senate Primary Has Already Made History—and It’s Not Over Yet Texas’s Senate Primary Has Already Made History—and It’s Not Over Yet

Democratic nominee James Talarico is getting national media attention, but the real story is sky-high voter turnout, even amid GOP bids to suppress balloting

Ana Marie Cox

Quilted Messages

Quilted Messages Quilted Messages

Sunbonnets carrying not-so-sunny truths.

OppArt / Jane Pearlmutter

How the Theatrics of Mamdani’s Trump Meeting Backfired

How the Theatrics of Mamdani’s Trump Meeting Backfired How the Theatrics of Mamdani’s Trump Meeting Backfired

By pandering to the president’s vanity, the New York mayor reinforced Trump’s image as a strongman commanding deference—an especially bad look on the eve of Trump’s war with Iran

D.D. Guttenplan

Volunteers with New York Common Pantry help to prepare food packages on October 30, 2025, in New York City.

Students in New York Are Going Hungry. How Can Mamdani Help? Students in New York Are Going Hungry. How Can Mamdani Help?

With plans for city-owned grocery stores and a focus on affordability, the new mayoral administration offers fresh hopes of successfully confronting the food crisis among students...

StudentNation / Nikole Rajgor

We Are the Fire That Melts the ICE

We Are the Fire That Melts the ICE We Are the Fire That Melts the ICE

Oaxaca, Mexico, street art.

OppArt / Line Marker