Nancy Pelosi’s Rant Against Cease-Fire Supporters Will Hurt Biden’s 2024 Campaign
The ex-speaker’s “delusional” attack insults millions of voters—and reveals the scorching ignorance of top Democrats about the depth of opposition to Israel’s war.

Nancy Pelosi on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, January 29, 2024.
(CNN)Nancy Pelosi went on CNN’s State of the Union Sunday and insulted tens of millions of Democratic voters—and millions of potential Democratic voters who are critical to the party’s prospects in 2024 presidential and congressional races—with a rant against supporters of a cease-fire in Gaza that revealed the scorching ignorance of top Democrats regarding widespread and sincere opposition to Israel’s assault on the Palestinian enclave.
Pelosi appeared on the Sunday morning show with the apparent intent of talking up President Biden’s reelection bid. But she did Biden no favors with comments that suggested she simply does not comprehend the depth of opposition within her own party to Israel’s bombing and invasion of Gaza, which has killed more than 25,000 Palestinians over the past three months. Pelosi contended that critics of the Biden administration’s steady support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s war are Russian dupes, or worse. She even urged the FBI to investigate anti-war protesters.
Responding to a question about cease-fire protests that have interrupted events featuring Biden—and about the prospect that anger over the administration’s support for Netanyahu and the war might lead to a drop-off in support for Democrats among Arab Americans, young people, and progressives—Pelosi began on a dismissive note. The former speaker told host Dana Bash that she had “been the recipient of their, shall we say, exuberances, and it’s as recently as in Seattle on Thursday, unfortunately wanted to disrupt our very exciting Democratic meeting there. They’re in front of my house all the time. So I have a feeling for what feelings they have.” Then, after expressing a measure of sympathy for Gazans who are “suffering” and “don’t have any place to go,” Pelosi smeared the activists who want to end that suffering.
“But for them to call for a cease-fire is Mr. Putin’s message, Mr. Putin’s message,” said Pelosi.
Make no mistake, this is directly connected to what he would like to see. Same thing with Ukraine. It’s about Putin’s message. I think some of these—some of these protesters are spontaneous and organic and sincere. Some, I think, are connected to Russia.
And I say that having looked at this for a long time now, as you know.
Bash interrupted to make sure she was hearing Pelosi right. “You think some of these protests are Russian plants?” asked the host.
“I don’t think they’re plants,” said Pelosi. “I think some financing should be investigated. And I want to ask the FBI to investigate that.”
Pelosi offered no corroboration to support her charge—beyond her vague comment that she had “looked at this for a long time”—and Bash did not follow up. It fell to other news outlets to point out that the former speaker’s remarks came from out of left field. “Pelosi’s comments marked the first time a prominent US lawmaker has accused Russia’s leader of backing US protesters calling for a ceasefire,” explained Reuters, which noted that her claims were made “without offering evidence.” Veteran Los Angeles Times international correspondent Megan Stack, who is now a New York Times commentator, was blunter. “Having covered both Russia and Israel for years, having written very directly about the malignity of Putin’s government and the horrors of his wars on Ukraine and Georgia as well as this blood-drenched onslaught on Gaza,” said Stack, “I find this [claim] from Pelosi nauseating.”
Law professor Zephyr Teachout, a former Democratic congressional candidate, expressed concern that Pelosi was out of touch with the current debate, saying, “This is obviously nonsense, but more worrying because it reflects a deep structure of wrongness, of wrong understanding.”
Yet the discussion inspired immediate headlines, announcing, “Pelosi suggests some pro-Palestinian protesters are connected to Russia,” and “Nancy Pelosi seeks FBI probe into protesters seeking cease-fire in Gaza.”
That won’t help Biden rally a Democratic base that, polls suggest, has grown increasingly frustrated with the president’s support for Netanyahu and the war. And it could further estrange new voters—especially, but not exclusively, young people and Arab-Americans in swing states such as Michigan—whom Democrats need to draw into their coalition if the party is going to prevail in November.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) decried Pelosi’s comments as ”unsubstantiated smears,” with CAIR national executive director Nihad Awad observing, “Representative Pelosi’s claim that some of the Americans protesting for a Gaza ceasefire are working with Vladimir Putin sounds delusional and her call for the FBI to investigate those protesters without any evidence is downright authoritarian.”
Awad argued that Pelosi’s charges “echo a time in our nation when opponents of the Vietnam War were accused of being communist sympathizers and subjected to FBI harassment,” while noting: “Hundreds of thousands of Americans, including many young people, progressive activists, and Jewish, Muslim, Palestinian, and Black Americans, have been protesting to call for a ceasefire in Gaza. Instead of baselessly smearing those Americans as Russian collaborators, former House Speaker Pelosi and other political leaders should respect the will of the American people by calling for an end to the Netanyahu government’s genocidal war on the people of Gaza.”
While the Republican National Committee gleefully amplified Pelosi’s remarks, author and foreign affairs commentator Trita Parsi, the executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, retweeted a clip of the former speaker’s appearance on CNN and asked, “Is this the Democratic Party’s plan to delegitimize authentic fury over the slaughter in Gaza? Labeling Gaza ceasefire calls as ‘Putin’s message.’”
If so, it’s unlikely to succeed. No matter what Pelosi says, opposition to the administration’s support for Netanyahu and the war continues to grow among Democrats, and among voters that the party needs to attract in November. Even as they condemn the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel, many of the party’s most prominent elected officials and grassroots activists have argued that the ensuing Israeli assault on Gaza has been disproportional and must stop. More than 65 congressional Democrats—members of the House caucus Pelosi once led—have called for a cease-fire. And there is growing concern among Democratic strategists that Biden’s stance could cost him critical support in states he must carry in the fall.
Abdullah Hammoud, the Democratic mayor of Dearborn, Mich., a city with a large and politically engaged Arab American population that Biden and the Democrats need to win over if they hope to carry Michigan, summed up the problem, when he observed, “So, based on Nancy Pelosi’s remarks, 76% of Democrats / 49% of Republicans / 61% of Americans are potentially paid operatives of Russia who are pushing Putin’s message of calling for a ceasefire??” The mayor was citing a late-November Data for Progress survey, which found those levels of support for a permanent ceasefire and de-escalation of violence in Gaza.
Popular
“swipe left below to view more authors”Swipe →Mayor Hammoud, who refused last week to meet with Biden’s reelection campaign manager to discuss the impact that the administration’s stance on Israel-Palestine issues is having on the 2024 campaign, pointed to Pelosi’s remarks and said, “The Democratic party leadership is in disarray.”
Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign
With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.
As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.
The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.
We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.
It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation
More from The Nation
Mamdani and the DSA Just Sent a Seismic Message: The Revolution Is Here to Stay Mamdani and the DSA Just Sent a Seismic Message: The Revolution Is Here to Stay
A stunning trio of congressional victories proved that the political earthquake the mayor and his allies ushered in was no fluke.
The New York City Race Where the Establishment Won The New York City Race Where the Establishment Won
And why that’s a good thing.
Street Art as Solidarity Street Art as Solidarity
Barcelona street art in support of Palestine, June 2026.
The Unlikely History of Israel Bonds The Unlikely History of Israel Bonds
How a little-known investment vehicle became a major source of financing for Israel—and a flash point in New York State politics.
JD Vance’s Latest Memoir Preaches to the MAGA Choir JD Vance’s Latest Memoir Preaches to the MAGA Choir
The vice president claims to have reached a new level of spiritual maturity, but the evidence is nowhere in the pages of Communion.
Brainless: Artificial Intelligence Brainless: Artificial Intelligence
The promise of AI comes with risks—from misinformation and bias to the erosion of human agency.
