On June 23, a slate of progressive candidates endorsed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani swept New York’s primaries, ousting incumbents and promising to grow the Squad in Congress. The sweep resounded across subway lines and entire states: The country is buzzing, and the establishment is on notice—democratic socialism is no longer the favorite dog whistle of centrist Dems.

But curiously absent from campaigns driven by the aching need for a more affordable New York and nation was a focus on the single greatest affordability crisis and threat tohuman rights: the climate crisis. Israel-Palestine, ICE, and housing all headlined, yet in a city with a rich history of massive climatemobilizations, climate action and environmental justice were sidelined. Even when candidates had robust climate platforms, climate change didn’t generally feature prominently in candidate forums, rallies, or media coverage.

Recognizing these candidates’ priorities as a real-time response to deep-seated voter frustration, the exclusion of climate from the agenda only years after it played a vital role for Democrats in the 2020 presidential election begs the question: Is climate change no longer a hot topic?

According to a just-released analysis by Inside Climate News, Democrats are indeed withdrawing from tackling the climate crisis. Democratic Members of Congress “have embraced [a] message of ‘climate hushing,’ with mentions of climate change plummeting since 2025.”

The irony is that the impacts of climate change are increasing everywhere. Only two days after the primaries, an event focused on extreme heat was canceled in London amid scorching temperatures that have put Europe under a “red alert” and led to drownings in France as people try to cool down.

Addressing climate change not only complements but is critical to solving the problems progressive candidates most often focus on: inequality and injustice in our housing, food, immigration, and education systems, among countless other public policy issues.

Current Issue

July/August 2026 Issue

Take housing, for instance. Young people overwhelmingly feel that it’s harder to buy a home today than it was in our parents’ generation. The long-standing dream of American homeownership is not fading fast merely because of skyrocketing rents and a lack of affordable housing stock. Exacerbating both factors is climate change.

Insurance companies know this: Amid increasing billion-dollar climate disasters (data the Trump administration is no longer updating) and extreme weather events, insurance companies are abandoning servicing high-risk areas and hiking premiums. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has warned that within the next 10–15 years, “there are going to be regions in the country where you can’t get a mortgage.” The same communities that struggle to access quality, affordable insurance and continue to suffer the effects of historically discriminatory housing policies, which intersect with present-day climate vulnerability, are disproportionately affected when the cost of climate catastrophe gets priced into the mix.

Or take affordable groceries. Rising temperatures are driving inflation in food prices worldwide, as is dependence on a volatile, unsustainable fossil fuel economy. Similar intersections arise in the context of education, as extreme heat inhibits students from learning, and immigration, as climate change becomes another factor displacing families and driving them to seek refuge across borders.

Inflation, unhelped by Trump policies of robbing the poor to stuff the rich and the upheaval of energy markets by the US war on Iran, has only heaped more pressure on everyday Americans’ bank accounts. But in the background of every purchase, every commute, every school drop-off—often ignored yet persistently accelerating—lies the climate crisis.

In 2018, members of the Sunrise Movement, along with the then-new representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), occupied former House minority leader Nancy Pelosi’s office to urge a Green New Deal. The protest attracted national media attention and helped propel Ocasio-Cortez to stardom—it both reflected and amplified climate action as a defining mobilizing force of the left.

Since then, the stakes of the crisis have only increased. The world has seen eight more of the hottest years on record, and governments have charted paths to blow past Paris Agreement goals. Meanwhile, fossil fuel companies are raking in mind-boggling profits while pursuing projects that will lock in dangerous warming and continuing to lobby against a desperately needed rapid fossil fuel phaseout.

At a moment when the need for climate action is greater than ever, talk about climate solutions should be commensurate. People haven’t stopped caring: A majority of American voters continue to worry about the climate crisis and see companies and government as responsible for confronting its effects. But Democrats are shying away from this responsibility, as the climate-hushing phenomenon shows.

For fossil fuel companies, having Democrats make climate change the sacrificial lamb—especially when, as longtime advocate Senator Sheldon Whitehouse highlights, there is so much reason to doubt that this myopic tactic will help, as opposed to harm, Democrats—is a dream come true.

For decades, only one party has consistently recognized and, in its best moments, taken steps to address the climate crisis. Yet as the crisis mounts, it seems to be disappearing from progressive legislative dockets, debate stages, and teleprompters. Is it not cool to talk about climate change anymore?

Whatever the political calculus behind this retreat, progressives cannot afford to treat climate change as a secondary issue. Our ability to confront this crisis requires the most ardent and vocal champions of affordability and corporate accountability to put it on the agenda. Many voters, especially young people, are counting on Democrats to fight for our futures at every turn—from climate change to healthcare, higher education, and the cost of living crisis.

Affordability means climate action and climate justice. Too often, a just green transition gets confused for a rose, but this fight is about having our bread—not just for tomorrow but for every day after and for generations to come.