Environment / June 20, 2025

The Climate Costs of War

Scientific analyses show that the Ukraine and Middle East wars have unleashed staggering amounts of planet-warming emissions.

Mark Hertsgaard

Smoke fumes cover a neighborhood in Beirut following an Israeli air strike on October 19, 2024.

(adel Itan / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images)

On the ground, “more than 50,000 children have reportedly been killed or injured since October 2023” in Gaza alone, UNICEF lamented last month. In Ukraine, more than 42,000 civilians have been killed or wounded, the UN Human Rights Commission reported. Countless more people are threatened by this week’s air strikes between Israel and Iran, not to mention last month’s hostilities between India and Pakistan.

Brave journalists on the ground risk their lives to tell the outside world what’s happening in these war zones. Less common is to tell the world what modern wars do to the sky—not only the sky over the war zones but the sky all people everywhere share.

Scientific analyses have consistently concluded that military operations in general—transporting troops, testing weapons, maintaining bases (the United States has more than 700 worldwide)—and modern war in particular are the most carbon-intensive activities on Earth. The gargantuan amounts of oil and other fossil fuels used to fly planes, launch missiles, drive tanks, propel ships, and power supply vehicles emit staggering amounts of planet-warming carbon dioxide.

That’s partly because the fuel efficiency of most war equipment is vanishingly small. “We’re talking gallons per mile, not miles per gallon,” Neta C. Crawford, a professor at the University of Oxford and author of The Pentagon, Climate Change, and War, told a Covering Climate Now press briefing last year. Emissions also spike when adversaries attack one another’s fossil-fuel infrastructure, as Israel, Iran, Russia, and Ukraine have reportedly done.

Routine military operations—separate from war fighting—account for an estimated 5.5 percent of the world’s annual CO2 emissions. “If the world’s militaries were a country, this figure would represent the fourth largest national carbon footprint in the world—higher than Russia,” Nina Lakhani reported in The Guardian. The 5.5 percent figure is only an estimate, Crawford told Lakhani, because a loophole the United States inserted into the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 exempts all militaries from disclosing their emissions—meaning the world’s total emissions are significantly higher than officially recognized.

A growing body of research by independent scholars is filling in the blanks, enabling journalists to report war’s long-term climate costs as well as its immediate human costs.

“The carbon footprint of the first 15 months of Israel’s war on Gaza will be greater than the annual planet-warming emissions of a hundred individual countries,” Lakhani wrote, summarizing one recent study. A separate study found that the war in Ukraine has a carbon footprint seven times larger—230 million tons of CO2 equivalent, Manuel Planelles reported in El País, just short of the 270 million tons that all of Spain emitted in 2023.

As casualties continue to mount, journalists unfortunately will have plenty of opportunities to make the climate connection to the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East. Meanwhile, climate-driven weather disasters are growing more frequent and severe around the world even as some governments are boosting military spending. “Emissions go up in step with military spending,” Crawford notes, “and this is exactly the wrong time to be doing this.”

Mark Hertsgaard

Mark Hertsgaard is the environment correspondent of The Nation and the executive director of the global media collaboration Covering Climate Now. His new book is Big Red’s Mercy:  The Shooting of Deborah Cotton and A Story of Race in America.

More from The Nation

A car is seen part submerged in floodwater in England, 2019.

Americans Are Concerned About Climate Change—but They Should Be Afraid Americans Are Concerned About Climate Change—but They Should Be Afraid

Americans still don’t comprehend how imminent, dangerous, and far-reaching the threat is—and journalists are partly to blame.

Mark Hertsgaard

Amsterdam climate protest

People Want Climate Action. This Data Shows It. People Want Climate Action. This Data Shows It.

It's an extraordinary popular mandate that extends across partisan divides and national borders.

Mark Hertsgaard

Bill Moyers in 2012.

Bill Moyers Helped Break the Media’s Climate Silence Bill Moyers Helped Break the Media’s Climate Silence

When Bill Moyers helped launch the Covering Climate Now media collaboration, he urged fellow journalists to “tell the story so people get it.”

Obituary / Mark Hertsgaard and Kyle Pope

David Schechter

CBS News Leans Into the Climate Connection CBS News Leans Into the Climate Connection

Since Trump’s election, the network has produced more than 60 stories on the climate crisis.

Mark Hertsgaard

How to Save the Amazon

How to Save the Amazon How to Save the Amazon

Listen to the people who live there, the slain journalist Dom Phillips advised.

Jonathan Watts

The full moon rises over the cooling towers of the Trillo Nuclear Power Plant in Guadalajara, Spain.

The False Promise of Nuclear Power The False Promise of Nuclear Power

A new book by Joe Romm explains why nuclear is not much of a climate solution.

Mark Hertsgaard