United Socialist States of America

United Socialist States of America

Last night Stephen Colbert quite cleverly invited the actualSocialist candidate for President ontohis show, to give him the opportunity to state the blindinglyobvious: Obama’s no Socialist. (Added bonus was hearing a real, actualsocialist explain his philosophy on national television. That doesn’thappen very often)

The McCainFoxDrudge campaign’s decision to focus the last few weeks ofthe election on the combined spectre of redistribution and socialism(not, it should be noted, the same thing) is, I think, really dumb.

First, it’s not working. A new WallStreet Journal poll shows likely voters favor Obama over McCain ontax policy by 14 points. Part of that is no doubt due to Obama’s nearobsessive focus on hammering home his proposal for middle class taxcuts, but it also seems entirely possible that a broad majority ofAmericans think that “spreading the wealth” isn’t such a bad idea rightabout now.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Last night Stephen Colbert quite cleverly invited the actualSocialist candidate for President ontohis show, to give him the opportunity to state the blindinglyobvious: Obama’s no Socialist. (Added bonus was hearing a real, actualsocialist explain his philosophy on national television. That doesn’thappen very often)

The McCainFoxDrudge campaign’s decision to focus the last few weeks ofthe election on the combined spectre of redistribution and socialism(not, it should be noted, the same thing) is, I think, really dumb.

First, it’s not working. A new WallStreet Journal poll shows likely voters favor Obama over McCain ontax policy by 14 points. Part of that is no doubt due to Obama’s nearobsessive focus on hammering home his proposal for middle class taxcuts, but it also seems entirely possible that a broad majority ofAmericans think that “spreading the wealth” isn’t such a bad idea rightabout now.

Second, they’re creating a mandate that Obama didn’t formerly have. David Sirota put it this way:

[W]hile Obama has offered up a progressive-though-moderateagenda slightly to the left of Clinton-ish neoliberalism, McCain hasgone totally ideological. In doing that, he has polarized the argumentand turned the election into a referendum on the economic Darwinism ofthe conservative movement – a Darwinism that, as my column shows, hasbuilt a machine that confiscates middle-class wealth and sends it up the income ladder.

And Marc Ambinder recently noticed the same thing:

…it might be dangerous for the Republican Party to elevate the stakes for this election to a death match between competing ideologies. If Barack Obama’s victory is as decisive as it is shaping up to be, the Democrats can justifiably claim that conservatism itself has been rejected as a political and governing philosophy. In the closing weeks of the campaign, as the Republican ticket continues to run against the very idea of progressive politics, they are sowing the seeds of the post-election realignment narrative.

I think this is exactly right, and not just because I think it’stransparently moronic to argue that the difference between Capitalismand Socialism is the difference between a 35 percent top marginal tax rate and a 39.5 percent one. Obama himself, while he does weave in an ideological story into his main narrative, he tends, instead to offer himself as post-ideological and pragmatic. The Right, meanwhile, has turned this election into a referendum on Socialism.

And they’re going to lose. Amazing.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x