The Bare Ruined Choirs of Notre Dame

The Bare Ruined Choirs of Notre Dame

This monument to medieval faith will surely be rebuilt—by the techno-mobilization of capitalist individualism.


In 1893 a nervous, balding little man named Henry Adams, who taught boring history at Harvard College and who happened to be a direct descendant of two US presidents, John and John Quincy Adams, visited the international exposition in Paris, escorted by a scientist named Langley. In the course of his tour, Adams recalled in his memoir, The Education of Henry Adams, Langley “showed his scholar the great hall of dynamos.” To Langley, Adams continued, “the dynamo itself was but an ingenious channel for conveying somewhere the heat latent in a few tons of poor coal hidden in a dirty engine-house carefully kept out of sight; but to Adams the dynamo became a symbol of infinity. As he grew accustomed to the great gallery of machines, he began to feel the forty-foot dynamo as a moral force, much as the early Christians felt the Cross.”

Adams was recalling his earlier thoughts after a visit to Chartres Cathedral, where he had an epiphany that the Christian faith, which he symbolized as the Virgin, had served to mobilize the power of thousands of ordinary citizens to build it and other great medieval houses of worship. At the 1893 international exhibition, Adams had another aperçu in which he saw the force of the dynamo as fissiparous, anarchic, complexifying. To understand the modern world of 1893, Adams realized, he must understand the dynamo. Just as the power of faith, for which he denominated the Virgin, was supreme in the time when Chartres and the other great cathedrals of France were built as monuments to the Christian faith, so was the dynamo the symbol of the modern. (Flash forward to E = mc2 and the hydrogen bomb.)

Earlier this week one of those cathedrals, Notre Dame in Paris, was seriously damaged by a fire that inexorably raged as thousands of weeping Parisians watched. Scarcely had the flames consuming the roof’s ancient timbers been extinguished than French President Emmanuel Macron was promising his fellow citizens that Notre Dame would be rebuilt within five years. Ironically, the man who summoned French men and women to unite behind this great national effort is a divisive politician, a corporate-backed leader bent on dismantling the French welfare state. Macron’s project stirred up the Yellow Vest protests, shaking his hold on power. In Macron’s fate we see glimmers of our own divisive president, who leads by uniting his base in un-Christian hatred.

In the TV coverage of the crowds mourning Notre Dame’s destruction, prayers to the Virgin Mary to save the church that is her namesake could be witnessed. One could not help but think that Macron was attempting to rally a nation that is predominantly made up of lapsed Catholics. His hope for uniting his people as a force to rebuild Notre Dame lay less in invoking the Virgin than in appealing to civic pride and tourism. It rested most solidly on the nation’s wealthiest families, who stepped forward after the tragedy to donate hundreds of millions of euros to rebuilding. The mobilization of the wealthy will help underwrite the modern technology that will need to be summoned to rejuvenate an ancient stone and timber structure.

This techno-mobilization represents what Adams might call the dynamo: Science rather than the Virgin will erect a sleek, shiny, new Notre Dame. It took a great collective effort to build Chartres and Notre Dame, inspired by faith and ideals. Those qualities we lack in our own times of Trumpian and Macronian capitalist individualism.

If we were honest, we would advise the Macron government to include in its blueprint for a new Notre Dame restrooms and cafeterias and souvenir stands for the thousands of tourists who will come and marvel (and yes, some of them, to pray). The place where Joan of Arc was beatified will retain its historic resonance, but you could be forgiven for guessing that its civic-secular identity will be far greater than its religious one.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy