Supporting Sotomayor

Supporting Sotomayor

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to replace David Souter as Supreme Court Justice is a nice reminder of the type of change that the Obama administration does represent. Though not the most liberal of the prospective jurists, as John Nichols rightly noted, not only does Sotomayor’s nomination make history but, if successful, it will start to establish an effective counter-balance to Chief Justice John Roberts’ efforts to turn back the clock on a raft of issues especially those pertaining to race and anti-trust regulation.

Sotomayor’s smarts, charisma and judicial philosophy are all on display in this short clip from May of 2003, when she served as Pace University School of Law’s commencement speaker

By nominating Sotomayor, Obama is also bucking the will of an ugly little whisper campaign that tried to derail the nominee, as Brian Beutler neatly details at TPM. “Once it was obvious that she was a serious contender, an unknown number of Second Circuit prosecutors and former clerks banded together and approached The New Republic‘s legal correspondent Jeffrey Rosen with attacks on the prospective nominee’s fitness. The sources told Rosen, among other things, that Sotomayor lacked the intellectual heft and good manners to serve on the court, and, in an article billed as the first in a series of analyses of potential nominees, Rosen went with it. From there, the attacks went viral.”

Rosen’s argument is well off the mark, as a quick look at Sotomayor’s career and a cursory glance at these good articles quickly make clear. Nonetheless, the anatomy of this scurrilous whisper campaign suggests the nature of the fight that could rage over her nomination.

As John Dickerson recounts at Slate today, in early reaction to the pick, Republicans are already targeting what they argue is Sotomayor’s judicial activism. “We will thoroughly examine her record to ensure she understands that the role of a jurist in our democracy is to apply the law evenhandedly, despite their own feelings or personal or political preferences,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Meanwhile, at the Washington Independent, David Weigel calls out new right-wing efforts to caricature Sotomayor as an “enemy of the white male.” Watch this space for info on how best to support Sotomayor’s appointment.


PS: If you have extra time on your hands and want to follow me on Twitter — a micro-blog — click here. You’ll find (slightly) more personal posts, breaking news and lots of links.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x