Strategic Reset: Movements React to Midterm Losses

Strategic Reset: Movements React to Midterm Losses

Strategic Reset: Movements React to Midterm Losses

November’s elections were a wake up call for movements around labor, the environment, immigration and education. Did activists tether themselves too closely to Democrats? What should they do now? A Nation special package.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This fall’s midterm elections were not only a setback for Democrats and the Obama administration. As a result of Republican gains, social movements for unions, public education, immigrants’ rights and the environment face a new and daunting landscape. Progressives may disagree about the extent to which the Democrats’ electoral defeat calls into question the strategies these movements had been pursuing. But all recognize that the new political reality requires a recalibration of tactics, a rethinking of priorities, a reassessment of goals and approaches to achieving them. In short, we need a strategic reset. Amid the rubble there are opportunities to be found, not least the chance for deep discussion. We hope this is the beginning of one.

Christian Parenti, "Green Strategy Now"
After the demise of climate legislation, environment groups are going local—and confrontational.

Jane McAlevey, "Making Unions Matter Again"
For too long, unions have mistaken access for power. They need to get back to organizing and activating members.

Daniel Altschuler, "Immigrant Activists Regroup"
Over the past decade, the immigrants’ rights movement has become a strong grassroots force. But it has not yet developed a unified legislative strategy that can shape the national debate.

Pedro Noguera, "Reframing the Education Debate"
Obama’s education policy is far too close to George W. Bush’s. Those of us who recognize the importance of public education can’t wait for the administration to lead the way.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x