RNC’s Steele Decides It Is O.K. to Play the Race Card

RNC’s Steele Decides It Is O.K. to Play the Race Card

RNC’s Steele Decides It Is O.K. to Play the Race Card

Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele used to be able to muster a lot of disdain for political players who suggested that criticism of them might be racially motivated. But no more.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele used to be able to muster a lot of disdain for political players who suggested that criticism of them might be racially motivated.

"I don’t play the race card, I don’t play the race game, the way some tend to do," Steele, the Republican Party’s most prominent African-American leader, declared last November.

The RNC chair used to argue that the very mention of race as a factor in how pols are perceived and treated was liberal whining and he has said that he is "sick and tired" of those on the left who "play that race card, that slavery card, that civil rights card (when) their backs are up against the wall."

But no more.

Steele, who has since assuming the leadership of the Grand Old Party taken hits from disgruntled RNC staffers, key Republicans in Congress and, above all, conservative talk-radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, is now wondering aloud about whether criticism of him is motivated by racism.

Steele has certainly experienced his share of partisan and ideological poking and prodding from Democrats and liberals since taking over as the RNC’s top man last year, criticism that he suggests is rooted in: "The general mindset when you see, hear or read about an African American, you think, politically, Democrat. And all of a sudden, you’ve got this brother who’s a Republican…"

But what’s made news more often than not has been the inside-the-big-tent battering he’s gotten from conservatives like Limbaugh, who once complained that the chairman was behaving like a "talking head media star" and, according to the conservative Washington Times newspaper, "from prominent GOP operatives and fund-raisers (who) have criticized Steele for seeming to focus more on his own image (and pocketbook) rather than the good of the party."

In a new interview with Washingtonian magazine, Steele, one of the Republican party’s most high-profile African-American stalwarts for a number of years, noted that Democratic National Committee chairman Tim Kaine, who is white, doesn’t seem to be the target of the same sort of griping, embarrassing leaks and negative publicity that the RNC chair is experiencing.

"I don’t see stories about the internal operations of the DNC that I see about this operation," Steele wonders. "Why? Is it because Michael Steele is the chairman, or is it because a black man is chairman?"

The difference may have something to do with the fact that Steele came to the chairmanship as a defeated U.S. Senate candidate with slim managerial experience, while Kaine is a former mayor of Richmond and governor of Virginia who is highly regarded for his political and managerial skills.

Then again, Steele has presided over a string of off-year and special-election victories that have renewed GOP confidence.

So is Steele right? Is he a victim of racially-motivated Republicans and conservatives who just can’t get comfortable with an African-American leader? Or is the "liberal" media playing up leaks about problems inside the party because he is an African-American Republican?

The RNC chairman certainly has a right to his opinion, even if it may make his job harder.

The Hill newspaper, a journal of D.C. insider reporting and commentary, speculates that Steele’s latest remarks have the potential to inflame the chairman’s more ardent conservative foes. "Steele’s comment about racism, however, will only further anger his Republican critics, who have lamented his repeated gaffes," suggests The Hill.

If all this causes Steele to feel a bit isolated, perhaps he could commiserate with another African-American leader who has taken a lot of hits from RNC members, key Republicans in Congress and, above all, conservative talk-radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh.

What’s that other guy’s name? Oh, right, Barack Obama.

A crazy left-wing notion?

Not anymore.

Asked by ABC News about the Washingtonian interview, Steele said it was not about race before he said it was about race. And he compared his circumstance with that of… the president.

"It’s not because of my race," said Steele, "but race is more of a factor than it ordinarily would be — just as it is for Barack Obama."

Steele says it’s especially hard on African-American Republicans.

But, hey, that’s cool. He’s not playing the race card. Or maybe he is.

Or, maybe, as Steele said Tuesday: "Oh, no. Accidents happen, baby."

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x