Repairing American Democracy Should Be a Central Issue in the 2016 Campaign

Repairing American Democracy Should Be a Central Issue in the 2016 Campaign

Repairing American Democracy Should Be a Central Issue in the 2016 Campaign

Three ways to fix US politics: Reduce big money, end gerrymandering, make it easier to vote.  

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Nine years ago, when he announced his run for president on the steps of the Illinois state capitol in Springfield, Barack Obama declared that “the ways of Washington must change.”

But in addition to the gridlock and rancor in Washington, the American political system has gotten much worse since Obama was elected, through no fault of his own.

The Supreme Court allowed unlimited secret campaign contributions and gutted the Voting Rights Act. Twenty-one states passed new voting restrictions targeting the core of Obama’s political coalition. Gerrymandering reached new lows following the 2010 election.

Returning to Springfield to address the Illinois legislature yesterday, Obama offered three ideas for how to repair America’s broken political system.

1. Reduce the corrosive influence of money in politics.

“I don’t believe that money is speech or that political spending should have no limits,” Obama said, in contrast to the Citizens United decision. He noted that 150 families have spent as much on the presidential race as the rest of the country combined. He said he supported a constitutional amendment “to set reasonable limits on financial influence in American elections,” and called for more modest immediate reforms

2. Change the way congressional districts are drawn.  

Congress has a 10 percent approval rating, but 90 percent of incumbent members of Congress are reelected. That’s because so many of them represent safe, gerrymandered seats, which they often helped draw. “In America, politicians should not pick their voters; voters should pick their politicians,” Obama said. That means putting redistricting in the hands of independent actors without a partisan motive.

3. Make it easier, not harder, to vote.

The 2016 election is the first in 50 years without the full protections of the VRA. Sixteen states have new voting restrictions in place since Obama’s reelection. “Today, I ask every state in America to join us—reduce these barriers to voting,” Obama said. “Make it easier for your constituents to get out and vote.”

To improve voter participation, he called for states to adopt early voting, same-day voter registration, and automatic voter registration. He noted that states with same-day registration had the highest voter turnouts in 2012 and 2014. And he said that automatic voter registration, which has become law in Oregon and California, should be passed nationwide, which would add 27 million Americans to the voting rolls, according to Demos. Obama called for Illinois to take the lead. “Let’s make the Land of Lincoln a leader in voter participation,” he said.

These ideas sound like common sense, but have become surprisingly contentious. Obama noted that Republicans in the Democratic-controlled Illinois legislature applauded his remarks on gerrymandering but not on voting rights. “Now, this shouldn’t be controversial, guys,” Obama said. “You liked the redistricting thing, but not letting people vote. I should get some applause on that, too.”

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton have endorsed many of the solutions Obama advocated. But with the exception of Sanders’s loud opposition to the Citizens United decision, the issue of political reform has not been central to the presidential campaign. The Democratic candidates should make restoring American democracy a centerpiece of their campaigns, especially as a way to draw a contrast with the GOP candidates, who all support tough new voting restrictions.

There have been 13 presidential debates so far and no mention of voting rights, despite the fact that this is the first presidential election since the VRA was gutted. This week Democratic Congressmen Keith Ellison and Mark Pocan sent a letter to PBS urging the network to highlight the issue during tonight’s Democratic debate in Wisconsin. “Our democracy is strongest when everyone is able to participate and it is time to fulfill that promise to the American people,” they wrote.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x