Please Let the Shooter Be on the Other Guy’s Team!

Please Let the Shooter Be on the Other Guy’s Team!

Please Let the Shooter Be on the Other Guy’s Team!

We can’t help but think that—but only one team gets top-notch fear mileage.


Before we knew learned the identity of the shooters who massacred 14 people in San Bernardino, before we learned there was more than one shooter, I assumed that the gunman was another white, right-leaning domestic terrorist. Why he’d target a county-run health center for the developmentally disabled was unclear: Because it represented the government, and Obamacare? Or, I admit it crossed my mind, because Donald Trump’s vicious mimicking of a disabled New York Times reporter triggered some unspeakable reflex? (As it turned out, none of the victims were disabled.)

At that early point, Leon Wolf of the conservative was on the lookout for liberals like me jumping to conclusions—as I was on the lookout for wingers who assumed it was Muslim terrorism. Wolf trolledbreaking: Mass Shooting in San Bernardino, Liberals on Twitter Ecstatic,” and he ran “some tweets from liberals who are involved in their favorite sporting event, pin the shooting on a conservative!” To say anyone was “ecstatic” is disgusting, but this meme then making the rounds did speak to me.

At the same time, though, the right was crossing its fingers and pleading, as it did during the previous week’s Planned Parenthood attack: Please let it be a transgender leftist activist—anybody but a white, pro-life, Christian male whom we’ll have to fit into our “mentally deranged and apolitical” narrative.

But when the names of the shooters Syed Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, surfaced, you could almost hear the right’s whoops of, if not ecstasy, then of sweet revenge. The New York Post changed its cover headline from the cautious murder mission to the incendiary muslim killers. (Where was the Post headline christian killer for suspected Planned Parenthood attacker and self-described Christian Robert L. Dear Jr.?) Fox News anchors kept saying that Farook attacked his co-workers at a “Christmas party,” although most legit news sources described it as a “holiday party”—which is indeed what a government agency would call it. But Fox had found a seasonal twofer: Muslim terrorists (and their liberal symps) are leading the War on Christmas!

What we have in these mass shootings, time and again, is each side accusing the other for prematurely pointing fingers.

Yes, I am saying “both sides” do this, but it’s not a false balance to point out that both sides are desperate to avoid blame. Beyond that, though, there is an enormous imbalance in how any politically inflected mass shooting is played out in the media. The right gets more fear mileage out of these tragedies, in part because it feeds on media that reflexively individualize the white male, while presenting Muslims, or Latinos or blacks, as undifferentiated hordes. The right’s savvy use of fear and stereotypes is right now fueling actual policy: blocking immigration reform and progress on bringing refugees to America. The left, meanwhile, is seeing reproductive rights chipped away at and gun control measures, at best, frozen.

And most mainstream news media don’t bother to remind the public that since September 11, 2001, more Americans have been killed “by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims.” San Bernardino is the 355th mass killing this year, and the vast majority don’t involve Muslims at all.

Some media are trying to transcend the Christian vs. Muslim fixation by focusing on the common denominator in all mass shootings: guns.

The New York Daily News cover headline yesterday was provocative: god isn’t fixing this, it read, and the story went on to quote the Republican presidential candidates who tweeted that their “thoughts and prayers” are with the victims and their families. The subhead was even stronger: “As latest batch of innocent Americans are left lying in pools of blood, cowards who could truly end gun scourge continue to hide behind meaningless platitudes.”

The right insisted on reading that headline as an attack on prayer, instead of as a plea for politicians to take action. “I say this,” Fox & Friends’s Elisabeth Hasselbeck intoned, “if you want to line up with terrorists and try to take God away, you’re not on the right side.”

But conservative Joe Scarborough, who has consistently promoted gun control on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, parsed it like a Venn diagram. Whether Robert Dear slaughtered people because of ideology or because of a mental-health problem, or whether the Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik slaughter resulted from a workplace dispute or from jihadism, “the point is,” Scarborough said, “they have more guns than the police.”

The real politics of San Bernardino will boil down to something simpler: boosting Donald Trump. A CNN poll, taken before the massacre, just put him 20 points ahead of his closest opponent, Ted Cruz.

Right before San Bernardino, the Republican front-runner declared that he would “take out” the families of terrorists. In the two days since, he’s been tweeting about more mundane matters, like his book (“crippled america is perfect gift for friends & family”), his perfect health and “great genes,” and his “vindication” after finding a couple 2001 reports referring to some Muslims here and there in New Jersey who celebrated 9/11—though Trump is still far short of the “thousands” he insists he saw on TV with his own eyes.

Most tellingly, though, the morning after San Bernardino, Trump chose to re-tweet a supporter’s post that said, approvingly, “his poll numbers jump every time instances like this occur.”

Thank you for reading The Nation

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Ad Policy