Orrin Hatch Was Never a ‘Public Servant’

Orrin Hatch Was Never a ‘Public Servant’

Orrin Hatch Was Never a ‘Public Servant’

The retiring senator has always been a shameless tool of billionaire campaign donors and a partisan errand boy for the likes of Donald Trump.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Orrin Hatch referred last year to his long Senate tenure as “my whole stinking career.”

That was a fair assessment of the Utah Republican’s 41 years in Washington.

Seventy-five percent of Utah voters told pollsters last fall that they did not want the senator to seek reelection in 2018.

Hatch took the hint this week, announcing that he plans to retire after four decades of placing special interests and the personal power that is obtained by serving them above the public interest and the people whose lives are made dramatically worse when government abandons them.

Few, aside from President Trump, Republican majority leader Mitch McConnell, and the lobbyists for the special interests Hatch served, will miss one of the most egregious hypocrites ever to serve in a chamber where mendacity has always been well represented.

Hatch was elected to the Senate in 1976, after running a campaign that anticipated the crudely divisive strategies and relentless negativity that have come to characterize contemporary campaigning. Hatch was a pioneering practitioner of the new politics of shameless pretense that would come to define Washington. A Republican who had moved to Utah from Pennsylvania, he claimed that the incumbent Democratic senator, who had been born and raised in Utah, was out of touch with the values and the concerns of the state.

That was a fantasy developed by the political con artists who had the malleable newcomer run on the issue of term limits. Hatch made a joke of incumbent Frank Moss’s three terms of honorable service in the Senate: “What do you call a senator who’s served in office for 18 years? You call him home.” And Hatch promised not to serve for too long in Washington.

Both the slogan’s suggestion—that Moss had nothing more to contribute—and the term-limits commitment were shameless lies.

Moss was not a typical politician. He was one of the most effective public servants of the 20th century. While studying at George Washington University’s Law School in Washington, he worked during Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s first term with the National Recovery Administration, the Resettlement Administration, and the Farm Credit Administration. After graduating, he joined the legal staff of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, serving during the period from 1937 to 1939 when it was chaired by future US Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas. Upon his return to Utah, Moss was elected to a Salt Lake City municipal-court judgeship; but when the call of duty came with the bombing of Pearl Harbor, he signed up for the US Army Air Corps, serving in Europe through much of World War II. Back home, he was again elected as a judge and then became a county prosecutor before his election to the US Senate in the Democratic wave election of 1958.

As a senator from Utah, Moss backed civil rights and women’s rights, promoted nuclear disarmament, and opposed the war in Vietnam. But what earned him praise as “the conscience of the Senate” was his advocacy for those who could not afford to hire lobbyists.

The veteran of the Roosevelt administration brought a bold New Deal vision to the Senate where he outlined an agenda that sought to expand access to health care (as an original sponsor of Medicaid legislation), to protect the environment (as a leading advocate for the creation of new national parks), and, above all, to put federal policy on the side of consumers. Moss used his position as chair of the Senate Commerce Committee’s subcommittee on consumer protection to sponsor legislation that took on the tobacco industry (sponsoring the 1966 Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act that required cigarette companies to include warnings about health threats on cigarette packages and erected barriers to tobacco advertising on radio and television), cracked down on the manufacturers of dangerous toys and poisonous products (sponsoring the Toy Safety Act and the Poison Prevention Packaging Act), and forced manufacturers to stop ripping off consumers (working with Washington State Democrat Warren Magnuson to enact the groundbreaking Consumer Product Warranty and Guarantee Act). He led investigations of elder abuse, went after irresponsible doctors, and worked with Idaho Senator Frank Church to provide federal support for hospice programs.

In other words, far from being out of touch, Moss was determined to serve people in Utah and across the country who had been victimized by corporations. Unfortunately, as the corporations and their allies learned how to influence not just the legislative but the electoral process, a space was made for the likes of Orrin Hatch—a candidate The Salt Like Tribune referred to as “an aggressive, TV-ready opponent.”

Hatch’s attack campaign prevailed in 1976 and Moss was no longer able to lead the charge on behalf of citizens and consumers, of working people and the most vulnerable Americans.

Over the next four decades, Hatch would serve as a dramatically different senator from his predecessor. Self-absorbed and boastful, Hatch calculated that his political future would be best served by aligning with those who could write big campaign checks. Hatch took care of his political benefactors and seemed always to be plotting his next move (angling for a place on the Supreme Court or on a Republican presidential ticket, elbowing his way into key committee assignments). When Democrats controlled the Senate, Hatch was ready to cut deals, even with liberals like Massachusetts Senator Edward Kennedy. When Republicans took charge, however, he became the most shameless of partisans—as when the same senator who repeatedly savaged professor Anita Hill on behalf of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas played a critical role in blocking the Supreme Court nomination of Merrick Garland (whom he acknowledged was an outstanding jurist) in order to prevent President Barack Obama’s nominee from getting a place on the high court.

Elite media outlets gave Hatch plenty of coverage, and cover, because the relentless self-promoter was always ready to deliver a talking point or appear on a political talk show. But they could not obscure the fact of his steady hypocrisy—which included the abandonment of the term-limits pledge that was so central to his initial campaigning.

Across four decades, Hatch’s steadiest default positions were as a robotic ally of the oligarchs from whom he collected tens of millions in campaign dollars, and as an errand boy for Republican presidents up to and including Donald Trump. Responsible Republicans kept their distance from Trump, but Hatch declared: “We’re going to keep fighting, and we’re going to make this the greatest presidency that we’ve seen, not only in generations, but maybe ever.”

Last fall, the Utah senator played a critical role in moving the GOP tax bill through the Senate Finance Committee he chaired.

As crude as ever, Hatch blew up over the suggestion that he was acting as what he has always been: the manservant of billionaire class.

Before a key vote on the tax bill, Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown said: “I just think it would be nice, just tonight, before we go home, to just acknowledge, ‘Well, this tax cut really is not for the middle class—it’s for the rich.’ ”

The chairman exploded, calling the criticism “bull crap” and griping that: “I really resent anybody who says I’m just doing this for the rich. Give me a break.”

In fact, Hatch was just doing it for the rich—as he did throughout a Senate career that will never be mistaken for “public service.”

Frank Moss was a public servant who was willing to risk his career in order to represent the people versus the powerful. He started off on the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission and remained a watchdog to the end.

Ironically, the latest campaign-finance reports for Orrin Hatch show that the biggest source of campaign money for the Senate Finance Committee chair in recent years has been the securities industry and related special interests. He remained their lapdog to the end.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x