One Year Later, Haiti Hasn’t ‘Built Back Better’

One Year Later, Haiti Hasn’t ‘Built Back Better’

One Year Later, Haiti Hasn’t ‘Built Back Better’

The year of relief efforts following Haiti’s devastating earthquake has only exposed of the failures of the NGO aid system.


In the aftermath of the earthquake that hit Haiti on January 12, 2010, those who were desperate to find something positive in the tragedy that claimed an estimated 230,000 lives talked about the "opportunity" the destruction could present for the impoverished nation to "build back better." On the tragedy’s one-year anniversary, it’s become clear that perhaps the only positive aspect of the past twelve months has been the exposure of the failures of the NGO aid system, and the international community’s long-standing use of the country as a laboratory for cashing in on disaster—both of which have been wrecking havoc on this country since long before the earthquake.

Despite being home to the world’s highest density of NGOs per capita, Haiti is presently being ravaged by a cholera epidemic with an official death toll of some 3,300, with experts estimating the number of dead at twice as high.

More than a million people are still living in overcrowded camps under the same now-frayed tarps they received last January. A third of these camps still don’t have toilets, and most Haitians have no access to potable water.

The cholera may have spread to Haiti via latrines on the base of the UN’s Nepalese troops, which emptied into the country’s main river, inflaming the already widespread contempt for the UN’s interminable MINUSTAH occupation. This, followed by an election bankrolled and endorsed by the international community, but widely denounced within Haiti as illegitimate and fraudulent, has caused protesters to barricade streets in several cities with burning tires, cars, garbage dumps, as well as coffins and portable toilets as barricades, hindering cholera relief, spreading the epidemic and plunging the country deeper into socio-political chaos.

A lull of a political stalemate has settled over Haiti in anticipation of the month-and-a-half-old election results. But the Center for Economic and Policy Research independently recounted and reviewed the 11,181 tally sheets and found massive irregularities, errors, and missing vote totals. “The OAS can’t salvage an election that was fundamentally illegitimate, where nearly three-quarters of the electorate didn’t vote, where the most popular political party was excluded from the ballot, and the vote count of the minority that did vote was severely compromised,” said Mark Weisbrot, CEPR co-director.

In the past weeks, several highly-placed diplomatic and Haitian establishment figures have voiced what Haitians have been saying for months: forever excluded from any process determining their political and economic sovereignty, Haitians are now being excluded from the reconstruction of their nation.

The twelve Haitian members of the Interim Haiti Reconstruction Commission—a twenty-six-member body that decides where to spend money donated to Haiti’s reconstruction—presented a letter of protest to co-chairman Bill Clinton at the commission’s most recent meeting on December 14.

They complain of being "completely disconnected from the activities of the IHRC," given no background information on the projects they are supposed to fund, given “time neither to read, nor analyze, nor understand—and much less respond intelligently—to projects submitted" the day before they’re voted on. There is no follow up on previously approved millions in funds; they "don’t even know the names of the consultants who work for the IHRC nor their respective tasks.”"

These twelve board members surmised that their only function is to rubber stamp, as Haitian-approved, decisions already made by the executive committee—Bill Clinton, Haitian Prime Minister Jean-Max Bellerive, and long-time US State Department employee at USAID as well as a US informant inside President René Préval’s inner circle Gabriel Verret.

As if to highlight the disposable role of Haitian leadership, the last meeting went ahead without the second co-chair, Prime Minister Jean-Max Bellerive, who couldn’t attend because the meeting was held in the Dominican Republic, as post-election political turmoil shut down Haiti’s capital.

Why has the international community excluded Haitians from the process of allocating aid funds? A recent AP investigation revealed that of every $100 of Haiti reconstruction contracts awarded by the American government, $98.40 returned to American companies, suggesting that non-Haitian companies and organizations have much to gain from the relief effort. Haiti’s reconstruction, like almost everything else in that country, has been privatized, outsourced, or taken over by foreign NGOs.

Last week, OAS special representative to Haiti Ricardo Seitenfus was ordered to take an indefinite leave after giving a hard-hitting interview denouncing UN’s "imposed" occupation, which, he said, was “transforming Haitians into prisoners on their own island.” He argued that NGOs use of Haiti as a "training ground" for young humanitarian "amateurs," saying that "Haiti’s original sin, on the world stage, is its liberation," being the first black republic born of the only successful slave revolution in modern history. For the past 200 years, Seitenfus continues, "It is force that defines international relations with Haiti and never dialogue."

It’s not so much what he says—it’s what Haitians say all the time—but the fact that he’s an OAS representative. Earlier this week, Seitenfus gave another interview in which he recounted with horror that "on November 28, the day of the elections, there was discussion in a meeting of the Core Group (donor countries, OAS and the United Nations) of something that seemed to me simply frightening. Some representatives suggested that President René Préval should leave the country and that we should think about an airplane for that purpose."

To Seitenfus, this was an ominous déjà vu of the US, French and Canadian backed coup d’état against democratically elected President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, who still lives in exile after having been flown out of Haiti on a plane in 2004.

Aristide’s political party, still the most popular in Haiti, was excluded from running, making these elections illegitimate a priori. On top of an already low voter turn out, would-be voters were disenfranchised, reportedly walking past the bodies of cholera victims on the street in search for different polling station with their name on the list, only to find not their names the name of their neighbor who died in the earthquake. Haitians called the practice "eleksyon zombi," because the dead were being used to do the bidding of their enemies. By noon, the majority of the candidates held a press conference calling for the election to be annulled.

Edmond Mulet, MINUSTAH occupation troop’s first in command—no doubt sitting at this meeting with Seitenfus—personally called two of the leading candidates, Michel Martelli and Mirlande Manigat, the morning after the election telling them to withdraw from the group of candidates calling for the election’s annulment because (he told them) they are the leading candidate. Four other candidates also claim that Mulet, or someone from his office, called urging them to withdraw because they were in a favorable position.

Was Mulet playing divide and conquer to save face for organizing the security and logistics for an election marred by rampant fraud? Was he calling on behalf of the UN, or someone else? 

Imposing a weak unpopular government that can be dismissed as hopelessly corrupt, ensures that Haiti serve the world as a disaster training ground for international troops and NGO workers, while transnational reconstruction companies can frolic in the lavish destruction.

Disasters catalyze neo-liberal policies of liquidating the state and atrophying the mechanisms of democracy have been carried out to such a perfection that the only "opportunity" brought on by the earthquake, should be, as Haitian veteran observer put it, to "listen to Haiti, because it is the canary in the world’s mine."

Thank you for reading The Nation

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Ad Policy