My Life as a Rabbi

My Life as a Rabbi

Inviting me to a recent wedding in Virginia, the proud parents asked if I would do some sort of officiation.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Inviting me to a recent wedding in Virginia, the proud parents asked if I would do some sort of officiation. It would be my second turn in this role, having acted as priest/judge at a rural splicing here in the Northern California backwoods some years ago. On that occasion I wrote up a laicized version of the wedding ritual in the sixteenth-century Book of Common Prayer, shorn, naturally, of the bit about her obeying him. Then the couple nipped into a back room, where there was a real judge on hand to make it legal.

This time, beside a pond in a green field in rural Virginia, there was no judge, but none was necessary, since the couple had already eloped back in January, getting married on the bus the bridegroom’s film collective uses on its cinematic ventures.

Why, you ask, would anyone ask a raffish antinomian of 1960s vintage to preside at any ceremony beyond the increasingly familiar one of throwing the ashes of some deceased lefty comrade over the back of a boat or off the top of a mountain? Maybe it’s all those years on the road giving booster talks to radical groups, raising money for all the good causes. I’ve learned how to look a crowd in the eye, speak as though I mean it and not mumble.

The male guests at the affair in rural Virginia were all in black tie and dinner jacket. It had been years since I put on a tuxedo but I found one in an old trunk, given to me by the daughter of a British diplomat. I’d kept it for possible use at Halloween. Taking it to the cleaners I noticed that the poor fellow, an ambassador, had spent so many years resting his wrists on the table at a thousand dreary official dinners, mumbling “fascinating” at the anecdotes of his neighbors, that the cloth on the buttons of his jacket cuffs had entirely worn away.

As officiator I reckoned I ought to distinguish myself from the common herd of tux wearers, and so I threw around my neck a white silk scarf with a Japanese motif picked out on it in crimson thread. Later my old friend Seymour Hersh came up to me and said he’d arrived a bit late, hurried down to the pond and said to his wife, Liz, as they craned to observe the ceremony, “Now I’ve seen everything. Alex has become a rabbi.”

My officiation went smoothly. I kept my remarks brief, imparting to the crowd the news that the couple were already married and had demonstrated their progressive commitment by getting spliced on an instrument of mass transit, which was also a temple of the arts. I stuck in words like “witness,” “solemnize” (a prissy word, I know; I wanted to say “comedify” but thought it too tricksy) and “celebration” to lend a tinge of formality to the event. Then I yielded the floor, or rather the pond-side, to the couple, who spoke to each other, and the crowd, with glorious feeling and eloquence about their love for each other.

No stumblings here! Their professions of love had the grace of an aria in Mozart. If the younger crowd can talk like that, I’ll stop wailing about the grossness of hip-hop.

I kept the scarf on amid the drinking and eating that followed, and was amazed at how many people concluded that I must somehow be, in a manner as yet undivulged to them, a man of the cloth. It shows that people feel no formal event is complete without a shaman of some sort on the premises, and thus were prepared to regard me as a priest or rabbi, all other evidence and prior knowledge of my character notwithstanding.

So take this as a formal flaunting of my shingle as Officiator. Have scarf, will travel. I even have an Airstream as changing room, if my rig becomes more elaborate.

I also offer my services as elegist at funerals or wakes too, though unlike many leftists I dislike cremations. Radicals tend to like incineration of the deceased and subsequent dispersal of ashes in romantic surroundings because it’s good resource management, with the phoenix motif as a bonus. Being Anglo-Irish, I regard cremations as pagan beastliness and believe in coffins lowered with dignity into the dirt.

Crypts are OK too. One Anglo-Irish old neighbor from West Waterford left directions that he was to be buried in the family crypt, with a key to it in his pocket and a bottle of brandy by the coffin (lid not nailed down, naturally), cork loosened. He hailed from an earlier generation, brought up at the knee of Victorians, who lived in terror of premature burial. My Aunt Joan was like that too. “When you deem me to have expired,” she would say to Dr. Galvin in her deep voice, at the age of 87, “cut deep into my wrists, to be completely sure.”

Flushed with satisfaction at the proceedings in Virginia, I repaired a few days later to a green hillside above Santa Cruz, California, where a friend was graduating from Kresge College, UCSC. Now, UCSC’s founding moment was back in the 1960s, amid high professions of hope that this could be a sanctuary, amid the redwood groves of the old Cowell ranch, of medium-to-higher learning designedly athwart convention. Kresge in particular was designed to be communal, antinomian even.

Nearly half a century later one would have to say that convention appears to have triumphed utterly. Up there, on the beautiful greensward, shimmering Pacific to the west and the blue arc of heaven above, there was scarcely a black face in the crowd and, most definitely, there wasn’t a shaman in the house.

Another old friend, Conn Hallinan, now provost of Kresge, did not permit his radical lineage to intrude in any way on a torrent of benign platitudes. The keynote speaker, Carolyn Martin Shaw, a professor of anthropology at Kresge, was deprecating about Kresge’s early years, but not in a way that permitted useful reflection. Not a tincture of politics, of history, of inspiration uplifted her humdrum observations. I’m not saying that all graduation addresses have be plump with homilies about duties incumbent on graduating youth amid all the corruptions of empire. But one does expect something, beyond what my father’s tutor told him as he departed Oxford: “Well, Cockburn, hitherto your life has been criss-crossed with terms, exams and holidays. Now, it’s pretty much a straight run to the grave.” Surely the pioneers of UCSC would have hoped for more uplift than that.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x