Lee Fang: Christie’s Political Donors Are Managing State Pension Funds

Lee Fang: Christie’s Political Donors Are Managing State Pension Funds

Lee Fang: Christie’s Political Donors Are Managing State Pension Funds

And they're raking in a lot of money regardless of how well their funds perform, Fang says on All In with Chris Hayes.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As a gubernatorial candidate, Chris Christie blasted then-Governor Jon Corzine for using high risk “alternative investment” strategies for New Jersey pension funds. But once Christie became governor, his appointees doubled the allocation of pensions going to “alternatives” like hedge funds, says Nation contributing writer Lee Fang on All In with Chris Hayes. Only now, the hedge funds where pension money is invested include ones run by major contributors to Christie's political campaigns. “They’ve received millions of dollars in fees regardless of the performance of their funds, so they’re helping Chris Christie’s political career and receiving a lot of money,” Fang says. Even leaving politics aside, "alternatives" probably aren't the best pension investment strategy, Fang adds. Drawing on his article in The Nation, he notes that research on both the right and the left shows pension funds perform better with more conservative investment strategies than with alternatives like hedge funds. What's more, "hedge funds and other alternative investments have huge fees associated with them, so even when they do return a high value, that’s eaten away by these fees.”
Justine Drennan

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x