John Sifton: Why Do Drones Disturb Us?

John Sifton: Why Do Drones Disturb Us?

John Sifton: Why Do Drones Disturb Us?

What makes drones so frightening to us now, when they have actually been around for decades?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

What makes drones so frightening to us now, when they have actually been around for decades?

What makes drones so disturbing to us now, when they’ve been around for decades? John Sifton, Asia Advocacy Director at Human Rights Watch, attempts to untangle the answers to that question in this episode of Nation Conversations. He argues that because drones linger over the battlefield and allow us to target specific individuals, not just places, they seem more like “robot assassins” and less like other, more traditional kinetic weapons. Sifton and executive editor Betsy Reed also discuss the policy issues surrounding drones, animal behaviorist theories of aggression, post-traumatic stress disorder and the sanitization of violence.

For more, read Sifton’s article, “A Brief History of Drones,” in the current issue of The Nation.

Subscribe to Nation Conversations on iTunes for exclusive audio of Nation editors and writers digging into the topics and issues that shape the magazine. Check back for a new episode each Thursday.

Erin Schikowski

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x