Incomplete Wordplay

Incomplete Wordplay

A helpful technique for dealing with long theme entries

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

About a year ago, while puttering around in our cryptic lab, we stumbled across an idea that we didn’t recall having seen before—at least not in quite the form we ended up adopting. We were working on Puzzle #3260, and we faced a bit of a challenge in clueing the theme entries. All of them were reduplicated phrases—BUDDY-BUDDY, WALLA WALLA, LANG LANG and so on—and although the definitions were perfectly straightforward, the wordplay part was not. How do you handle an entry so clogged with repeated letters? Sure, we could do one as a letter bank—WALLA WALLA, for instance, banks nicely down to LAW—but that would still have left a half-dozen other theme entries that were equally intractable.

The solution was both simple and effective: we included wordplay for half of the answer only. So WALLA WALLA was clued by
   Everything can be found in Washington city (5,5) [W(ALL)A]
and BORA-BORA by
   Island to the west—a steal (4-4) [A ROB rev.]

As we generally do, we included one entry (DOUBLE VISION) to flag the presence of the theme, and to hint at the fact that there was something unusual about some of the clues. The clue for that had standard wordplay, but we packed the definition with enough information to help the solver deduce how the thematic clues worked:
   For the most part, suspect with jeans on, having one perceptual quirk that would
   help solve seven otherwise flawed clues in this puzzle (6,6)

And that might have been the end of it—except that Puzzle #3289 later showed up with a theme that turned out to be conducive to similar treatment. It wasn’t obvious to us right away, and on the first pass we tried to clue the theme entries with standard techniques. But as in the earlier puzzle, they all shared a common element that could be dropped from the wordplay without denying the solver critical information. (The solution is already posted on the Nation website, but we’ll avoid any further spoilers for the time being.)

What this suggests is that there’s a whole new area of theme-based wordplay waiting to be explored. This kind of thing is familiar in variety cryptics, where twists on the wordplay process—for example, having the wordplay lead to the answer plus one extraneous letter—are often done. But in the sort of black-square cryptics that we do for The Nation, leaving some of the wordplay to be supplied by the theme is not common at all.

And it’s especially useful here, because the theme entries are often fairly long—and long entries can be the trickiest to clue. Except in cases that lend themselves to smooth charades or containers, clues for long entries often wind up as massive anagrams or Rube Goldberg contraptions, when a solver would prefer something more straightforward. Incomplete wordplay, with thematic connections picking up the slack, is a fine way to make that happen— and it makes for a fun change of pace as well. You can expect to see this ploy used again in upcoming puzzles.

What is your reaction to incomplete wordplay in themed puzzles? Please share your thoughts here, along with any quibbles, questions, kudos or complaints about the current puzzle or any previous puzzle. To comment (and see other readers’ comments), please click on this post’s title and scroll to the bottom of the resulting screen.

And here are three links:
• The current puzzle
• Our puzzle-solving guidelines
• A Nation puzzle solver’s blog where you can ask for and offer hints, and where every one of our clues is explained in detail.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x