Hunger-Striking Asylum Seekers Bring Their Case to Clinton’s Front Door

Hunger-Striking Asylum Seekers Bring Their Case to Clinton’s Front Door

Hunger-Striking Asylum Seekers Bring Their Case to Clinton’s Front Door

Detention-reform advocates draw responses from Democratic candidates to a growing protest that began on Thanksgiving.


Immigration activists brought the current fight over immigrant detention to Hillary Clinton’s doorstep Thursday. Two dozen activists protested outside Clinton’s Brooklyn headquarters to push the Democratic presidential front-runner and Bernie Sanders to respond to #Freedomgiving—the name activists gave to a week-long hunger strike that began the day before Thanksgiving and is currently being waged by more than 100 asylum seekers who are held in at least six detention centers across the country.

According to Desis Rising Up and Moving (DRUM), the New York City–based group that has helped amplify strikers’ demands beyond the detention walls, more than 150 detainees are currently on hunger strike, including 14 detainees at Krome Detention Center in Florida who joined the protest on December 2.

Roughly two-thirds of the strikers are from Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Nepal, or India, and the other third are from Ghana, Togo, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, and Nigeria, according to DRUM’s executive director Fahd Ahmed. Every one of the strikers fled the threat of retaliation and persecution in their home countries, Ahmed says, and entered the country via a port of entry at the US-Mexico border in the hopes of being granted asylum.

As of Thursday, Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) own tally of hunger strikers stood at 109: 43 detainees at Etowah Detention Center in Alabama; 35 at Theo Lacy Immigration Detention Facility in California; 13 at Otay Mesa Detention Center, also in California; 11 at Denver Contract Detention Facility in Colorado; six at the South Texas Detention Center; and one at the Orange County jail in New York. DRUM and ICE’s numbers are different, at the very least due to how ICE classifies hunger-strike participation. ICE considers a person to be on hunger strike only when they’ve refused or missed nine consecutive meals.

Lorella Praeli, director of Latino outreach for Clinton, came outside and listened to the protesters as former detainees read statements about their time in detention and activists called for reform of the country’s immigrant detention system. Arturo Carmona, Praeli’s counterpart in the Sanders campaign, released a statement of support for the hunger strike just as the New York City action got under way.

“We listened to their stories, and are inspired by the important role that activism plays to implement change on behalf of immigrant families,” Jorge Silva, a Clinton campaign spokesperson, told me. “Hillary Clinton believes our immigration enforcement and detention system must be humane, and ensure the dignity, safety, and well-being of every human being.”

The first step in the asylum application process is to establish a credible fear of persecution or torture in a person’s home country, after which, ICE policy dictates that applicants be eligible for parole from detention. But, contrary to the agency’s policies, even detainees who have cleared the credible fear hurdle are being held for lengthy stays stretching up to two years, Ahmed says. “They all are people who had long, long arduous journeys to get here,” Ahmed told The Nation. “They are people who have seen death along the way, drowning, car accidents, suffocating, and that clearly indicates the level of desperation pushing people to flee.”

This latest string of hunger strikes is just the latest coordinated action to call attention to ICE’s detention policies. Last spring, 37 detainees, many of them South Asian asylum applicants, went on a hunger strike at the El Paso Processing Center, protesting similar indefinite stays and detention conditions. In October of this year, another 54 detainees, also from South Asia, did the same.

The US immigrant detention system has ballooned in recent years, reaching record highs during President Obama’s tenure. The United States detained 85,000 people in 1995, but by 2013, the annual count was more than 440,000. Congress has all but mandated that growth with legislative language that calls on ICE to “maintain a level not less than 34,000 detention beds” on a daily basis, which is widely interpreted as a detention quota. Despite efforts from the Obama administration to reform the immigrant detention system, complaints of mistreatment and policy violations continue. And so do the hunger strikes.

“US Immigration and Customs Enforcement…fully respects the rights of all people to voice their opinion without interference,” Bryan Cox, an ICE spokesperson, told me, adding that the agency “does not retaliate in an way against hunger strikers.”

But Rumon Ahmed, a detainee from Bangladesh currently being held at Etowah Detention Center, disputes that claim. Ahmed was brought to a hospital after four days of striking and he was forcibly catheterized by hospital staff—“in order to torture me,” Ahmed (no relation to Fahd Ahmed) says in recorded audio that was released and translated by DRUM.

Cox said that due to medical privacy rules he could not comment on Ahmed’s medical care, adding that detention centers employ full-time medical staff who provide “necessary and appropriate care” to detainees.

Among the protesters outside Clinton’s office on Thursday was Ali Hosen Sohel, a 28-year-old man from Bangladesh who fled his hometown after seeing political colleagues of his kidnapped, arrested, and even killed. Sohel was affiliated with his local committee of the current opposition party in Bangladesh and said he’d be subjected to reprisal should he be forced to return. To underscore the desperation that forced him to flee, Sohel recited the list of countries he traveled through to make it to the United States, first flying from Bangladesh to Trinidad, and from there to Guyana. From there, Sohel traveled by bus, car, and foot through Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala, before finally crossing through Mexico and into the United States at a port of entry in El Paso, where he was detained. Sohel was held for 10 months this year before he took part in a hunger strike in October, after which he was promptly paroled. Still, he says, his asylum application was denied, and he awaits likely deportation to Bangladesh.

“I know there’s hundreds of my brothers, my friends, other detainees, who are still in detention centers. People have been inside for a year, 20 months, and are not getting parole, not getting bond, and staying in horrible conditions,” Sohel told me through an interpreter. “I’m here to speak out for them.”

“Hillary will close private detention centers, and end family detention for parents and children who arrive here in desperate situations,” said Silva, Clinton’s spokesperson. “She believes we have effective alternatives to detention for immigrants who pose no flight or safety risk.”

Clinton has otherwise avoided wading into the finer points of immigration-detention policy. That continued Thursday. Praeli, herself a former immigrant rights activist, stood directly in front of the gathered protesters for the entirety of the action, and said that she came primarily to listen and remind the activists that “Hillary Clinton has been speaking about the need to have a humane immigration enforcement and detention system that values and ensures the dignity and safety of people.”

Sanders has also pledged to close privately run detention facilities, and last week released his immigration-reform platform, in which he promised to push Congress to end its detention-bed quota. “These aspiring Americans should not be criminalized, subjected to dehumanizing solitary confinement, or indefinitely detained,” said Carmona, Sanders’s director of Latino outreach.

Thus far in the presidential campaign, “you see these broad, vague promises and statements from candidates,” said Fahd Ahmed from DRUM. “But it’s in the details of things that are actually happening where you see how people’s views and perspectives play out.”

Thank you for reading The Nation

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Ad Policy