Government Shutdown Will Be Bad for Both Parties

Government Shutdown Will Be Bad for Both Parties

Government Shutdown Will Be Bad for Both Parties

On Bloggingheads, Ari Berman says that the Obama Administration has failed to steer the debate on economic issues to the Democrats’ advantage.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The Nation‘s Ari Berman joined Politico‘s Ben Smith for a Bloggingheads conversation about the increasing possibility of a government shutdown. Berman says that "For the longest time I felt like there was never going to be a government shutdown. This was all just posturing by both sides to try to get the best deal." But, in the last few days, Berman is no longer sure this is the case.

Both sides have now agreed to cuts of $33 billion, with Democrats taking a "scalpel approach" to cuts while the GOP is working to win much more "sweeping" cuts. But, in a late night meeting on Wednesday, Obama, Reid and Boehner failed to come to an agreement on how to avert a shutdown. Plus, as Berman explains, the Tea Party will not budge or come to an agreement—they want a shutdown.

These political games, according to Berman, are bad for both Democrats and Republicans. Unfortunately, President Barack Obama has allowed the conversation to be about whose cuts are better instead of resetting the debate to call attention to the need to create jobs and get the economy moving again. Obama hasn’t taken charge of the conversation surrounding budget cuts, and a lot of the "nuance" of his position on cuts is being lost on most Americans.

—Kevin Gosztola

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x