Did Trump’s Campaign Manager Assault a Female Reporter?

Did Trump’s Campaign Manager Assault a Female Reporter?

Did Trump’s Campaign Manager Assault a Female Reporter?

The videos are flooding in, the verdict is out, but either way, Trump has sowed enough doubt to come out on top.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

We’re now deep in a media fog of denials, double-downs, and Donald-created doubt about whether Trump’s campaign manager physically assaulted a female reporter from the conservative Breitbart News.

The farrago began late Tuesday night as Trump mingled with the press after his infomercial/press conference celebrating his primary wins in Michigan and Mississippi.

As Michelle Fields tried to ask Trump a question, someone violently yanked her left arm, nearly throwing her to the ground and leaving her bruised. Washington Post reporter Ben Terris, assigned to do a profile centered on Lewandowski, witnessed the assault and identified Lewandowski as the culprit. Team Trump denied this ever happened, and in a series of tweets, Lewandowski tried to smear Fields as an “attention seeker.” But audio released by Politico seemed to confirm Terris’s account, which he wrote about here.

Furthermore, Daily Beast media writer Lloyd Grove writes that a source told him that Lewandowski acknowledged to Breitbart Washington editor Matthew Boyle that he did grab Fields’s arm, but only because, in Grove’s words, “he didn’t recognize her as a Breitbart reporter, instead mistaking her for an adversarial member of the mainstream media,” as if that would justify the manhandling. (Later today from Breitbart: “The Trump campaign has evidently leaked an email” from Boyle that rejects Grove’s claim as “false.”)

Charges and countercharges have been flying all over the media, especially among conservative writers. “I stand with @MichelleFields and if the First Amendment means anything to you, you should too. Sadly, many promoting Trump in media won’t,” TownHall editor and Fox contributor Katie Pavlich tweeted. Tea Partier and radio host Dana Loesch has been leading the charge to #FireCoryLewandowski. “And any of you in new media, be you writers or talkers, who stay silent rather than condemn? You’re just as bad. Grow a pair,” she tweeted. Former RedState editor Erick Erickson added, correctly, that “the campaign staffer Ted Cruz fired never left bruises on anyone.”

And left and right, nearly everyone has attacked the fervently pro-Trump Breitbart for only weakly defending its own reporter. But after Terris’s report, Breitbart got some backbone and stood up for Fields, issued statement saying it was “disappointed” in the Trump campaign, and asked for (not exactly demanded) an apology. Breitbart also suspended reporter Patrick Howley for attacking Fields’s veracity, and even ran Grove’s scathing piece, DAILY BEAST: BREITBART ROLLS OVER AFTER REPORTER ‘GRABBED’ BY TRUMP AIDE, on its front page.

And that was where we stood until late this morning, when Breitbart.com mounted a series of still video clips of the media scrum. While it doesn’t show the actual assault itself, Breitbart writer Joel Pollak writes that eyewitness Terris probably confused Lewandowski with a security guard who had a similar crew-cut and was standing closer to Fields. Breitbart doesn’t question that Fields was grabbed or bruised, but it sounded as if it’s reverting to its earlier Trump-friendly form:

Contrary to what Donald Trump said Thursday evening after the GOP debate, the incident certainly happened. However, the person who made contact with Fields was likely not Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski….

Fields was indeed hurt in the altercation, and published a photograph of her bruises. Yet the available evidence from WPTV and ABC suggests that it was unlikely that Lewandowski was the person who caused her injuries.

Given the similarity in appearance between Lewandowski and the security official, and given the fact that Lewandowski was walking on the other side of Trump from where Fields was at the time, the possibility of mistaken identity cannot be ruled out. Indeed, given Lewandowski’s adamant denials (coupled with statements inappropriately impugning Fields’s character), it is the likeliest explanation.

That’s typical of the Trump-loving Breitbart, Terris told Wash Post media writer Eric Wemple:

For his part, Terris isn’t budging. “I saw what I saw,” said Terris in a brief chat with this blog. During the whole incident, says Terris, he had his “eyes trained on Corey Lewandowski,” because Terris was there to profile the campaign team with a focus on Lewandowski. Terris took strong issue with Pollak’s assertion that mistaken identity is the “likeliest explanation” based in part on Lewandowski’s denials. “Because he denied it?” asked Terris. “This is Breitbart.”

Still later in the day, Breitbart ran several updates, including stills and video from other sources that, as it says in an new headline, show “Lewandowski Reaching in Michelle Fields’s Direction.”

So, at the moment, no one can prove exactly what happened. Fields has filed a police report and Florida law enforcement is investigating.

Of course, what makes the accusations against Lewandowski so believable is that they come in the midst of increasing violence at Trump rallies. The day after Fields incident, Rakeem Jones, a black protester who was being escorted out of one of Trump’s rallies, was sucker-punched by John McGraw, a 78-year-old white man, who later said, “next time we see [Jones], we might have to kill him.” Security officials wrestled Jones, the victim, down to the ground, leaving McGraw free, though he was later arrested and charged with assault.

And recently a Secret Service agent at a Trump rally placed Time photographer Chris Morris in a choke-hold when he tried to step outside of the press pen. The Department of Homeland Security is investigating.

There’s little doubt that Trump incites a mood of violence and vengeance—he once suggested that protesters “deserved to get roughed-up,” that he’d like to punch a protester in the face, and that in the good days, dissenters would go out on “a stretcher.”

And he’s come close to directing a little of that mob action at other female reporters. Back in December he verbally attacked NBC correspondent Katy Tur at a rally, pointing her out to his loud, booing crowd: “She’s back there,” he said. “Little Katy. She’s back there. What a lie it was. What a lie—Katy Tur!”

After Thurday’s debate (during which CNN asked about the Jones’s incident but not Fields’s), Tur asked Trump about Lewandowski. Without video, we have to assume it didn’t happen and that she made it up, Trump said. Will you apologize or punish Lewandowski if it’s proven that he did attack Fields, she asked. Will you apologize if it didn’t happen, he fired back, and stalked off.

Whatever the various videos prove, whether Lewandowski attacked Fields or not, the doubt that Trump so masterfully sowed leaves him coming out on top, again.

That makes it even more likely that, should he become president, he’ll try to “open up” libel laws–making it easier to sue and intimidate the press and harder for them to report the truth.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x