Culture War Battle Stations

Culture War Battle Stations

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Part of the promise of the Obama campaign from the beginning has always been that he can somehow bring the culture wars to a close. There’s reason to believe in this promise: if there’s a single American who’s lived a life that more fully straddled the culture war divide than Barack Obama, I can’t name him or her. But the problem with being a peacemaker is that you can’t unilaterally end conflict if your opponents want to continue waging war. This is the way I put it in my profile of Obama’s chief adviser David Axelrod:

But consensus is a tricky business…as interested as you might be in unity, your enemies get a vote, too.

With Palin’s speech at the RNC, we’ve now entered the culture war phase of the election. And I’m a bit disconcerted about how effective the provocation has been in getting those on the left to wage culture war right back. Hard to blame them: the other side really did start it. They insulted community organizers and pretty much anyone that lives in a big city. It’s offensive stuff. But a few too many liberals I know have been throwing around the phrase “these people” in describing the right, a phrase that’s one of the most toxic in the English language. And I’ve been forwarded this obviously phony and patently absurd email which purports to list the books Sarah Palin wanted banned from the local library. (She did, I should note, actually inquire about how she could get books banned.)

But waging culture war back is not the answer. First it’s morally dubious, and allows us to stew in our own and stereotypes and self-righteousness. Empathy is a precondition of progress, that goes for our ideological enemies. But it’s also just not winning politics. It’s rigged in their favor. They’ve been waging this since Nixon and win more times than they lose. That will change some day in the near future, but right now, people need to channel their energy and angst and frustration into action, whether that’s volunteering or giving money, and not sniping.

UPDATE: Some readers in comments seem to think I’m urging a kind of high-road, Mr Nice Guy, positive approach to the campaign. Nothing could be further from the truth! Politics is about conflict, it’s about attacking and fighting and that’s all well and good. The left and the Obama campaign and everyone else should be attacking McCain/Palin/Bush/GOP for their extremist agenda, for their reckless and insane foreign policy, for their extension of the Bush economic policy in every single way, for their lying and fraudulence and feckless kow-towing to the right-wing of the party. I’m just saying don’t attack them on the culture war turf: like, for instance, Sarah Palin goes to a church where people speak in tongues! But by God, by all means: attack.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x