The Creative Electoral Response

The Creative Electoral Response

I refused to run a negative campaign for New York City Council, focusing instead on community and democratic empowerment.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

I have experience with creative response in my work as an activist and civil rights attorney. But only recently have I endeavored to bring creative response to the world of electoral politics. 

I was compelled to run for office after watching friends get arrested and held for days in an abandoned bus depot on the West Side Highway during the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York City. As a National Lawyers Guild volunteer attorney, I spent my mornings defending the arrestees at their arraignments. My evenings were spent getting food and medicine to them, and my afternoons at press conferences begging the police to stop arresting people. 

When that didn’t happen, I decided to run for an open seat on the City Council. As luck would have it, a year and a half into my race, the mayor, with the help of the Council, extended his—as well as their own—term limits, which pitted me against the Council’s incumbent sitting speaker. 

I refused to run a negative campaign and instead talked about community, empowerment and the proposition of government working for the people—in other words, creative response. I got a third of the votes in a three-way race against arguably one of the most powerful Democrats in New York City. But more important, my community developed an ability to organize that has helped us deal with subsequent adversities, like the closing of our only hospital. 

Next it was the Occupy movement that gave me insight into creative response. I was one of the attorneys tasked with responding to the first attempt by the city to evict the Occupiers from Zuccotti Park in October 2011. Alone, our legal working group would never have been able to stop the eviction. But working with a broad coalition of Occupiers, unions, grassroots organizations and elected officials, we were able to prevail, winning Occupy Wall Street another month in Zuccotti Park.

ALSO IN THIS FORUM

Antonino D'Ambrosio: “How the Creative Response of Artists and Activists Can Transform the World

Hari Kunzru: “Unacknowledged Legislators?

Staceyann Chin: “Resistance Through Poetry

Billy Bragg: “Jail Guitar Doors

DJ Spooky: “Reflections on Mortality From a Land of Ice and Snow

Stanislao G. Pugliese: “How the Study of History Can Contribute to Global Citizenship

Edwidge Danticat: “Homage to a Creative Elder

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x