Congress Rebuffs the FCC

Congress Rebuffs the FCC

The revolution may, in fact, be televised–and on C-Span, no less.


The revolution may, in fact, be televised–and on C-Span, no less. The Congressional revolt against the Federal Communications Commission’s loosening of media ownership rules has stunned a Bush Administration that is not used to facing bipartisan opposition on Capitol Hill. On July 23, in an unprecedented rebuff of big media’s agenda, the House of Representatives voted 400 to 21 for an appropriations bill that includes language blocking implementation of a rule that would permit a single corporation to own television stations reaching 45 percent of Americans. Then, Democratic Senator Byron Dorgan announced that after the August Congressional recess, he will use a rare “Resolution of Disapproval” to force a Senate vote to reverse both the television ownership measure and a “cross-ownership” rule change that would allow one company to own the daily newspaper and most of the major television and radio stations in a single city.

“I do expect in the Senate there is a very powerful appetite to curb if not all, then certainly a significant part, of the rules the FCC has crafted,” said Dorgan, whose co-sponsor is Republican Trent Lott. “The important thing here is to get this matter back at the FCC [and force the commission to] readdress it because there’s strong feeling in the Congress, and I believe in the American people, that they did not handle these decisions correctly,” declared Lott.

While conservative columnist William Safire still marvels at how he is lined up with Code Pink-Women for Peace in the fight with the FCC, it’s a fact that opposition to media monopoly makes for strange bedfellows. Fear that a dumbed-down, one-size-fits-all media will stifle diversity linked the National Organization for Women, the National Rifle Association, Common Cause, media unions, minority journalists, musicians and hometown activists in a coalition that flooded the FCC with more than 2 million communications opposing the rules changes. And the ideological diversity of the grassroots opposition has been maintained as the issue has moved to Congress.

Despite presidential veto threats, Republicans in both chambers keep balking. Visits home in August should strengthen their resolve, as constituents vent frustrations with the excesses of the media giants. Even country singer Merle Haggard is on board, with a song, “That’s the News,” that bangs corporate media for echoing–rather than questioning–the President’s spin on war with Iraq.

The next challenge is to get Democrats thinking bigger. An amendment by Representatives Maurice Hinchey and David Price to block the cross-ownership rule change failed when sixty House Democrats opposed it. Many said they feared that pushing too hard would provoke a Bush veto. But when Democrats are less willing to challenge the Administration than Trent Lott, they are becoming a too-loyal opposition. Instead of compromising, Congressional Democrats should follow the lead of Vermont Independent Bernie Sanders, who is promoting town-hall meetings across the country this summer to back not just a rollback of the FCC rule changes but a broader push to reassert public control of the public’s airwaves.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy