Can a Hip-Hop Morality Clause Work?

Can a Hip-Hop Morality Clause Work?

Tolu Olorunda It’s the idea of one legendary black MC, who’s dedicated two decades to the fight against rap-related violence.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Tolu Olorunda

It’s the idea of one legendary black MC, who’s dedicated two decades to the fight against rap-related violence. Can a Hip-Hop Morality Clause Work?

Tolu Olorunda

September 1, 2009

A middle-aged female attorney calls for hip-hop artists to be held to a contractual obligation against violence. Must be elderly elitism wagging its ugly finger at a young, misunderstood generation.

But what if a respected, legendary black MC, who’s dedicated two decades to the fight against rap-related violence, like, say, KRS-One, proposed the same concept? Would the response be any different?

Most likely.

When news broke last week that New York attorney Lauren P. Raysor was seeking avenues through which record labels would be forced to include, in the contracts of all artists signed to their company, a “morality clause,” the hip-hop community was riled up with rage over the mere suggestion that it couldn’t police itself.

Attorney Raysor, who is former president of the Metropolitan Black Bar and, according to her bio, has worked on civil rights causes, was compelled to go public with her proposal after representing a client in a criminal lawsuit against popular female Bronx rapper Remy Ma.

The aim, she explained in a press release, was to demand that “all record companies” insert a “morality clause” in the contracts of their artists, which would promote better self-restraint, and hopefully make the urge and impulse to act in self-destructive ways less sexy.

Of course, the labels have since been mum about it. They know the importance of images. They’re aware of the power of suggestion. They understand how critical it is that the white suburban kids for whom rap represents “rebel” music continue to see it as the dangerous, crime-centered, volatile piece of art mainstream media insists it is.

The giant, but crippled, labels also probably wouldn’t like to make such concessions in light of recent reports that rap pioneer Dr. Roxanne Shanté’s education was attained all-expenses paid–courtesy of a clause in her contract, which Warner Music never expected would be utilized.

But think about it for a second: Jay-Z, Nas, Lil’ Wayne, Busta Rhymes, Diddy and just about every other megastar the hip-hop world has produced have been involved in criminal cases. They subsequently spent many months trying to clean up their reputations. Not until recently, when T.I. was sentenced to one year behind bars for federal gun charges, did it occur that hip-hop artists aren’t impenetrable when it comes to the law.

There’s another angle to this, however, which deserves just as much light. It’s intriguing that the criticism is centrally lobbed at young, black hip-hop stars. In many ways, I share some of the fear expressed by fans who contend it validates stereotypes about inner-city youth as criminal-minded. I would hate for this innocent suggestion to become fodder for racists or right-wing groups.

But, if this is what’s needed to curb the excessive violence taking place at random hip-hop concerts and events–too many to document–I could care less what plan prejudiced political opportunists have in mind.

Tolu Olorunda is a cultural critic who writes for BlackCommentator.com and ThisIsRealMusic.com, among others.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x