Building an Inclusive Climate Movement

Building an Inclusive Climate Movement

Building an Inclusive Climate Movement

A sense of urgency was palpable throughout the second day of the Power Up! Divest Fossil Fuels convergence at Swarthmore College.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Students at the Power Up! Divest Fossil Fuels conference
Students at the Power Up! Divest Fossil Fuels convergence.

The second day of the Power Up! Divest Fossil Fuels convergence at Swarthmore College featured strategy sessions and breakout caucuses. A sense of urgency was palpable throughout the heated workshops, discussions and panels held and the shape of a truly cohesive movement began to take shape.

During morning workshops, students attended sessions with outside activists and organizers to share skills and expertise to help build, continue, and escalate campaigns at their own schools and on a national level. In four different sessions, attendees participated in workshops like “Racism, Classism, and the Climate: How we Build a Strong, Inclusive Climate Movement” to “Endowments 201: The Ins and Outs of Your Investment Committee’s Thinking (and how to argue back)” to “How to Build a Badass Student Organizing Team.”

An afternoon panel highlighting activists from frontline communities—those impacted everyday by fossil fuel extraction, processing and use—was a powerful demonstration of the communities the divestment movement seeks to work in solidarity with. Crystal Lameman of the Beaver Lake Cree Nation in Alberta, Canada, Yudith Nieto working with the Tar Sands Blockade in Texas, Junior Walk of the Coal River Mountain Watch, a Pennsylvania anti-fracking organizer named Deirdre and Michael Bagdes-Canning of the Marcellus Outreach Butler in Pennsylvania all told powerful stories of the their communities. Stories of illegal privatization of First Nations lands, the effects of strip mining in Appalachia, water resource depletion and contamination with fracking fluid, and the very real health issues faced by these presenters, their friends, their families and their communities struck a chord with many, if not all, the students in attendance.

This newfound resolve was reflected in the words and ideas expressed during a session late in the afternoon, where small groups of students wrote down and then shared their visions for the movement. Organizers plan to consolidate the visions, finding common ideas and themes, to present to all attendees. During a “shout-out” period at the end of the session, students were asked to share their most important ideas, some of which were: working in solidarity with frontline communities, the recognition of divestment as just one tactic to achieve larger climate justice and social justice goals, organizing regionally and nationally, and setting clear short-term and long-term goals.

The keynote speechs that night helped to bring larger context to the formation of divestment campaigns. First Nations activist Lameman’s call for solidarity with the First Nations lawsuit against the Canadian government, which would invalidate 17,000 land leases on native lands. deepened students’ resolve to address larger justice issues. The Nation’s own Aura Bogado brought the larger idea of “climate debt” to the table, wherein the people of the Global South have a right to hold the Global North accountable for its abuse and overuse of global resources and atmospheric emissions. And finally, Ellen Dorsey of the Wallace Global Fund offered the story of her own involvement with the successful campaign to divest from South African apartheid in the 1980s, and how her foundation has successfully divested from socially irresponsible industries while still making a profit—and reinvesting in environment-oriented projects.

As students wrap up their work on Sunday, including a direct action on Swarthmore’s campus, a clearer vision of the student-led divestment movement, itself part of the larger climate justice movement, is beginning to form.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x