Bruno: Offensive, Funny or Just Shocking?

Bruno: Offensive, Funny or Just Shocking?

Bruno: Offensive, Funny or Just Shocking?

The Nation‘s Richard Kim and others discuss the admittedly provocative antics of Sacha Baron Cohen’s latest creation.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Sacha Baron Cohen’s new film, <a
href=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAGpmNb2xfQ”>Brüno,
premiered in theaters on Friday to
mixed reviews. Several were offended by the admittedly provocative
antics of Cohen onscreen. But was it offending the wrong people?

Scores of people from the gay community have voiced their distaste for
Cohen’s depiction of homosexuals in the movie, fearing that his behavior
perpetuates common stereotypes and strengthens homophobic tendencies. A
scene where Bruno treats a baby like an accessory has especially angered
some, in a time when the gay community is having difficulty gaining
adoption rights.

Others disagree, saying Brüno’s character is an obvious cartoon version
of the ridiculous stereotypes that have been wrongly placed on
homosexuals.

But in the end, Brüno is a comedy, so is it funny? And if so, do we
laugh more from satire or sheer shock value?

Here to discuss these questions and more we have <a
href=”/blogs/notion/450642/et_tu_bruno”>Richard
Kim of The
Nation
, <a
href=”http://www.gbmnews.com/articles/3105/1/Antoine-B-Craigwell/Page1.
html”>Antoine B. Craigwell of <a
href=”http://www.gbmnews.com/”>GBMNews.com, and <a
href=”http://www.iloveblackmovies.com/AboutShawn.html”>Shawn
Edwards, creator
of <a
href=”http://www.iloveblackmovies.com/”>www.iloveblackmovies.com and
contributor at FoxTV.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x