Amplification

Amplification

With recent reports linking high blood levels of lead to juvenile delinquency, the lead story grows.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

With recent reports linking high blood levels of lead to juvenile delinquency, the lead story grows. In our May 15 issue we ran a number of letters commenting on Jamie Lincoln Kitman’s “The Secret History of Lead” [March 20]. Additional communications since then prompt a further editorial comment. The original lengthy manuscript contained footnotes, scrupulously documenting the sources of all quotations, facts, analyses. These were used for fact-checking, but as an editorial decision these citations were omitted from the published article for reasons of style and length, although the names of primary sources consulted were listed in the author’s note. The editors regret the omission of the full citations to the articles from which Kitman drew important information and would like to give credit to those authors and articles and enable those interested to read them. Kitman joins us in gratefully acknowledging the pathbreaking work that preceded his article. Of particular value in providing archival material was David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, “A ‘Gift of God?’ The Public Health Controversy Over Leaded Gasoline During the 1920s,” American Journal of Public Health, April 1985. We also single out articles and papers by Alan P. Loeb on “Sloanism,” Ethyl’s divestments and the Kehoe rule: “Birth of the Kettering Doctrine: Fordism, Sloanism and the Discovery of Tetraethyl Lead,” Business and Economic History, Fall 1995; “Surmountable Obstacles to the Adoption of Emissions Trading Programs: The Historical Perspective”; and “Birth of the Kehoe Rule: Implications of the Surgeon General’s Review of Tetraethyl Lead, 1925-1926.” Special thanks also to the following authors: William Kovarik, “Henry Ford, Charles Kettering and the ‘Fuel of the Future,'” Automotive History Review, Spring 1998; William Graebner, “Hegemony Through Science: Information Engineering and Lead Toxicology, 1925-1965,” in David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, eds., Dying for Work: Workers’ Safety and Health in Twentieth-Century America, Indiana University Press, 1989. Jerome O. Nriagu, “Clair Patterson and Robert Kehoe’s Paradigm of ‘Show Me the Data’ on Environmental Lead Poisoning.” Jerome O. Nriagu, “Automotive Lead Pollution: Clair Patterson’s Role in Stopping It,” in Cliff Davidson, ed., Clean Hands: Clair Patterson’s Crusade Against Environmental Lead Contamination, Nova Science Publishers, 1999. H.L. Needleman, “Clair Patterson and Robert Kehoe: Two Points of View of Lead Toxicity,” Environmental Research, Section A, 1998. George B. Kauffman, “Midgley: Saint or Serpent?” Chemtech, December 1989.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x