How the US Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Forever War

How the US Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Forever War

How the US Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Forever War

In the 18 years since 9/11, war has become this country’s permanent condition, with no peaceful end in sight.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This September 11 marks the 18th year since hijackers seized four US airliners, plowing three of them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and the fourth into a field in southern Pennsylvania. The attacks killed nearly 3,000 people and deranged our national politics. In the fraught months that followed, US leaders declared one war after another, miring this country in conflicts from Central Asia to the Middle East. There is still no end in sight.

The longest of these conflicts—in fact, the longest war in US history—is the one that George W. Bush launched against the Taliban less than a month after 9/11. He called it “Operation Enduring Freedom” and claimed its mission was “to disrupt the use of Afghanistan as a terrorist base of operations and to attack the military capability of the Taliban regime.” He spoke of “freedom.” He trumpeted the “generosity” America would show the Afghan people. But many of us knew what this really was: a war of vengeance, waged against an impoverished country some 7,000 miles away, with no meaningful vision for peace.

And so it has been.

Nearly two decades later, Osama bin Laden, the mastermind of 9/11, is dead, but the war goes on. The illusory promises of building democracy and liberating women have been abandoned, yet the war goes on. Thousands upon thousands have died—at least 139,000 Afghans and some 2,400 US service members—and still the body count rises. Enduring freedom, indeed.

Presidents in both parties had promised to end the war, but to no effect. In September, Donald Trump torpedoed months of negotiations with the Taliban to withdraw some 5,000 US troops by early next year. But even that failed agreement called only for reducing US forces to their level when he assumed office. His campaign promise to end “stupid wars” has simply been abandoned.

The evidence of this broken promise is strewn across the globe. Since Trump took office, US drone attacks in several nations have escalated. Our forces continue to spread out across Africa in endless pursuit of would-be terrorists. Most egregious of all, he detonated the landmark Iran nuclear deal, pushing the US to the verge of war with that nation while talking up regime change in Venezuela.

And in the Middle East? Vast swaths of the region continue to reel from the bloody fallout of the US war on Iraq, its aftereffects visible in the flood of refugees that has shaken European democracies. Our War on Terrorism has succeeded, largely, in generating more terrorists and more instability.

Wars without end expand the prerogatives of the president and the budgets of the national security state. Presidents from both parties have repeatedly invoked the post-9/11 Authorization for Use of Military Force to dispatch troops across the globe. In today’s dollars, the Pentagon’s budget now exceeds its levels at the height of the Cold War.

Forever war is an affront to our Constitution. The founders, worried that the executive had an inherent propensity for war, gave the power to declare it to Congress, believing that this decision should be made only by the people’s representatives after debate and deliberation. Now, war is our permanent condition, and Congress has essentially abandoned its constitutional responsibilities.

Polls show that strong majorities of the public, including veterans, have turned against our endless wars. Both Trump and Barack Obama won elections promising to bring those wars to an end. Instead, they’ve succeeded only in making them less visible, relying more on airpower and drones, with fewer US casualties.

Trump has argued that “great nations do not fight endless wars.” Yet when he blew up the negotiations with the Taliban, he asked, “How many more decades are they willing to fight?”

The Taliban and the Afghan government are fighting over the future of their country. The real question is how many decades are we willing to fight in a foreign land on the other side of the globe in a war of no purpose other than to avoid losing?

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x