Afghan Farce: ‘Taliban’ Talker Was Phony!

Afghan Farce: ‘Taliban’ Talker Was Phony!

Afghan Farce: ‘Taliban’ Talker Was Phony!

Talking is still the way out. But, as Casey Stengel said, can’t anyone here play this game?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Shades of Manucher Ghorbanifar!
 
Ghorbanifar, of course, was the legendary faker who pretended (during the hilariously misguided Iran/Contra affair in the mid-1980s) to be an Iranian intermediary or spy of some sort who could help release American hostages held in Lebanon, and who turned out to be a fraud, or an Israeli spy, or something or other—but who certainly wasn’t what he said he was.

Maybe the fake Taliban member who swindled President Karzai and General Petraeus earlier this year was Ghorbanifar! In a fake Taliban beard and turban! Or maybe, whoever he was, he’ll turn up in Los Angeles this week peddling a reality show to the producers of Sarah Palin’s Alaska. Or maybe he’s a stand-up comic in Quetta, Pakistan, who keeps Mullah Omar rolling in the aisles with his bon-mots about how stupid the Crusader-Zionist alliance is, and then one day said: "You know, Omar, I can make them look silly!"

He did.

In a stunning revelation that ought to be fatally embarrassing to the Obama administration and its "AfPak" task force—even now conducting the promised, year-end review of a bungled war—the Washington Post and the New York Times, along with the AP, report that person who carried out secret talks with Karzai, the Afghans, and the United States this past summer was a phony. Reports the AP:

A man leading the Taliban side of peace talks with the Afghan government was an impersonator, an Afghan close to the negotiations said Tuesday, an embarrassing revelation for Afghan officials who have promoted reconciliation efforts as the best chance for ending the war.

Adds the Times:

For months, the secret talks unfolding between Taliban and Afghan leaders to end the war appeared to be showing promise, if only because of the appearance of a certain insurgent leader at one end of the table: Mullah Akhtar Muhammad Mansour, one of the most senior commanders in the Taliban movement.

But now, it turns out, Mr. Mansour was apparently not Mr. Mansour at all. In an episode that could have been lifted from a spy novel, United States and Afghan officials now say the Afghan man was an impostor, and high-level discussions conducted with the assistance of NATO appear to have achieved little.

The Times quotes a Western diplomat: "And we gave him a lot of money."

Count me among the fooled. Of course, I relied on Petraeus et al., who said that NATO had helped fly important Taliban leaders to Kabul for talks. But for Petraeus, the tip off should have been the absurdly modest "demands" of the fake "Taliban leader." Instead of asking for a share of government power in Kabul and the withdrawal of US and NATO forces, the phony Mansour just asked "that the Taliban leadership be allowed to safely return to Afghanistan, that Taliban soldiers be offered jobs, and that prisoners be released." Umm, no.

The thing is, there’s no way out of Afghanistan short of talking with the Taliban. But, as I’ve noted repeatedly, that means engaging not just with some fly-by-night "intermediary," Ghorbanifar-style, but getting the core Taliban council and its Pakistani backers in the ISI, Pakistan’s intelligence service, involved. The worrying thing, even in the early reporting of the purported talks, was that Pakistan was being cut out—and that would never work.

Meanwhile, unless he wants to be a laughingstock, Obama has to fire everyone involved in this charade.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Time is running out to have your gift matched 

In this time of unrelenting, often unprecedented cruelty and lawlessness, I’m grateful for Nation readers like you. 

So many of you have taken to the streets, organized in your neighborhood and with your union, and showed up at the ballot box to vote for progressive candidates. You’re proving that it is possible—to paraphrase the legendary Patti Smith—to redeem the work of the fools running our government.

And as we head into 2026, I promise that The Nation will fight like never before for justice, humanity, and dignity in these United States. 

At a time when most news organizations are either cutting budgets or cozying up to Trump by bringing in right-wing propagandists, The Nation’s writers, editors, copy editors, fact-checkers, and illustrators confront head-on the administration’s deadly abuses of power, blatant corruption, and deconstruction of both government and civil society. 

We couldn’t do this crucial work without you.

Through the end of the year, a generous donor is matching all donations to The Nation’s independent journalism up to $75,000. But the end of the year is now only days away. 

Time is running out to have your gift doubled. Don’t wait—donate now to ensure that our newsroom has the full $150,000 to start the new year. 

Another world really is possible. Together, we can and will win it!

Love and Solidarity,

John Nichols 

Executive Editor, The Nation

Ad Policy
x