What We Mean When We Say States’ Rights

What We Mean When We Say States’ Rights

What We Mean When We Say States’ Rights

This week sees the 150th anniversary of the secession of South Carolina—the beginning of the U.S. Civil War. And of course, the anniversary brings with it the predictable repetition of myths: the South seceded because those Northern elites wouldn’t let them govern themselves! It was about states’ rights and freedom.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

This week sees the 150th anniversary of the secession of South Carolina—the beginning of the US Civil War. And of course, the anniversary brings with it the predictable repetition of myths: the South seceded because those Northern elites wouldn’t let them govern themselves! It was about states’ rights and freedom. Right?

Author Edward Ball, who comes from a slave-owning southern family, reminds us that that’s not exactly the case. Simply read the states’ secession declarations: from Georgia to Mississippi, and of course, South Carolina, they all name continuing slavery as their top concern.

In a recent op-ed, Ball noted that just as the Southern states flattered themselves that they were enacting a new American Revolution, so too, the Tea Party crowd evokes that same revolutionary imagery around state freedom.

And it’d be funny if it didn’t pack such political punch. When Governor Rick Perry wonders aloud whether Texas could secede if it didn’t like laws of Congress, you can sit back and wonder how long it’ll be before he comes back to Washington for help with his ballooning state deficit.

But it’s not necessarily what happens that’s as important as what’s said. Some of the people pushing lawsuits against Obama’s health care plan, are also pushing for a constitutional amendment that would give states the right to overturn federal law. They too call it a strike for freedom.

And while it’s tempting to laugh at Washington politicians grandstanding about Washington power while they run for DC office, it’s hard not to important to remember that states’ rights as a rallying cry has a long and nasty history, and one based more often than not in race. From secession to integration to busing schoolchildren, politicians and public figures have trumpeted the idea of “states’ rights” to keep those pesky liberals from telling them how to treat people of color.

And now once again the specter of nullification raises its head, and though it’s unlikely to pass, it’s worth asking whether this has more to do with the color of the skin of the man who passed the bill than any contents of the health care legislation.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv and editor of At The Tea Party, out now from OR Books. GRITtv broadcasts weekdays on DISH Network and DIRECTv, on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter and be our friend on Facebook.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x