After Midterms, Top Reporters Stress GOP, Not Tea Party

After Midterms, Top Reporters Stress GOP, Not Tea Party

After Midterms, Top Reporters Stress GOP, Not Tea Party

New data reveals how top political reporters are framing the midterm results in recent questions and press conferences.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Elections have a way of setting agendas.
 
While the candidates elected last week will not actually wield power until January, the political world is already adopting the language of the midterms. 
 
That’s especially true for political reporters, who frame the questions thrown at the White House’s freshly shellacked podium.
 
To get a snapshot of the new language, The Nation counted up the most frequent words that reporters used in their questions during three major post-election sessions.
 
We used the day-after press conference with President Obama, a similar outing with press secretary Robert Gibbs, and a trio of Sunday talk shows—Meet The Press, State of the Union and Fox News Sunday.
 
Below is a snapshot of the New Change created through the website Wordle.
 

 
A few trends jump out here:
 
Down with GOP: Despite all the media coverage of the tea party, these reporters overwhelmingly frame the results as a partisan victory for Republicans, not a special triump for tea party Republicans. (It’s hard to even find "tea" in this mix—on the lower left.)

There is no focus on a single Republican leader. The GOP ran the election as a "referendum on Obama" and the economy, and these press questions suggest that line is sticking. There is no close-up for a top Republican, be it Boehner (a dot under the "Republicans" line), McConnell (tucked under "tea" and "question,") or Pawlenty (in the lower right corner between "big" and "next"). 
 
In media coverage about the midterms, of course, individual GOP candidates drew lots of attention. After Obama, four of the five top newsmakers in the campaign’s homestretch were Republicans, according to data from the Pew Research Center.  The initial reaction among Washington reporters, however, is not focused on GOP leaders. That could shift quickly as Boehner and Obama clash, or meet up for slurpee summits.

Shut it Down. Finally, on policy, these journalists clearly see the election results as catalyzing a challenge to Obama’s domestic spending priorities. The recurring battle words are spending, healthcare and cuts. Notably, however, "jobs" and "Social Security" barely register.


With research by Devon Bancroft.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x