Learning from Roosevelt(s)

Learning from Roosevelt(s)

Obama could don the mantle of two Roosevelts at once.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The President has a Rooseveltian opportunity, columnist Frank Rich wrote this weekend. Teddy Roosevelt was on his mind: stand off against the Titans of oil, Wall Street and mining, suggested Rich. The field is empty.

But the fact is, Obama could don the mantle of two Roosevelts at once. Channel FDR and announce a jobs program — against the polluters. Why not? Politically, unemployment may be danger number one.

According to recent Gallup polls, the enduring unemployment crisis is hitting Obama’s base where it hurts: among the young – the very people who showed up for him in 2008. As unemployment’s risen up about 4 percent, the president’s approval rating among Americans 18 to 29 is down 8 percent. And that’s an indication that the Democrats may be losing ground in the long term.

While some economists were predicting as many as 180,000 new jobs for May, the actual increase came in at 41,000. And the number out of work for 27 or more weeks remained at its highest level since the 1940s. Unemployment for teenagers was 26.4 percent in May – – and keeps going up. It’s going to be a long hot summer, with jobs in decline as well as social services.

On the rise: the so-called "skip-college" movement. Why, this theory goes, spend all that money on a college education when jobs are so scarce?

But former Labor secretary Robert Reich had a better suggestion: why not create a new Civilian Conservation Corps on the Gulf Coast, putting young people to work cleaning up after the oil spill — and send the bill back to BP? Channel Teddy Roosevelt and stick it to the polluters and channel FDR and put people back to work — and create programs that create goodwill for generations.

Support us by signing up for our podcast, and follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x