Why $700 Billion?

Why $700 Billion?

When I asked a Democratic house staffer recently where the $700 billion figure for the bailout came she mimed plucking it out of thin air. After today’s hearing, that question is still totally and completely unanswered. Many of the Senators, Chuck Schumer, Bob Corker and others floated the idea of disbursing a small percentage of the purchasing authority to be used in the next few months, and would then assess the program’s effectiveness in January.

Here was Paulson’s response to Corker’s suggestion to that effect:

PAULSON: Let me comment that under normal circumstances that would be a good way to go; these are extraordinary circumstances. We’ve been moving already to get ready to be in a situation where we can implement something after you all act. I believe, and the chairman believes, this is what we need here to deal with this market situation. They’ll be plenty of time to review what is done. You’ll have the opportuntiy to work with the new treasury secretary. We know how unusual it is to ask for this, but we asked for it because we think it’s to protect the taxpayer.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

When I asked a Democratic house staffer recently where the $700 billion figure for the bailout came she mimed plucking it out of thin air. After today’s hearing, that question is still totally and completely unanswered. Many of the Senators, Chuck Schumer, Bob Corker and others floated the idea of disbursing a small percentage of the purchasing authority to be used in the next few months, and would then assess the program’s effectiveness in January.

Here was Paulson’s response to Corker’s suggestion to that effect:

PAULSON: Let me comment that under normal circumstances that would be a good way to go; these are extraordinary circumstances. We’ve been moving already to get ready to be in a situation where we can implement something after you all act. I believe, and the chairman believes, this is what we need here to deal with this market situation. They’ll be plenty of time to review what is done. You’ll have the opportuntiy to work with the new treasury secretary. We know how unusual it is to ask for this, but we asked for it because we think it’s to protect the taxpayer.

Translation: because we said so. Or: trust us. They’re going to have to do better than that. They have to give some account of where they got that number, at a minimum. Before a real conversation can even start.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x