Model Healthcare

Model Healthcare

Pass new legislation to insure the best healthcare for America’s military personnel and make the Veterans Administration a model healthcare system.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

A decade ago American veterans’ healthcare system had become notorious for its deteriorating facilities and mediocre quality of care. It was no way to treat our veterans. But under President Clinton the VA system underwent a sea change. Where it had mainly offered inpatient care in often dirty, antiquated hospitals, the VA system was rebuilt to focus on outpatient care in modern clinics built in locations readily accessible to veterans. Equally important, eligibility requirements were changed so that every veteran could enroll. The number of patients doubled to nearly 5 million a year, and the quality of care rose with it. By 2003 a study in The New England Journal of Medicine found that veterans’ healthcare, once ridiculed by conservatives as a travesty of “socialized medicine,” had come so far that it equaled or surpassed the quality of even the most expensive private healthcare systems in America. VA healthcare had transformed into a promising model for a full-scale public healthcare system.

Unfortunately, this success story might not have a happy ending. No matter how well run the system is, each year brings a new budget fight in Congress to keep it afloat. Every year, President Bush’s requests have been far too modest to fund the VA system fully. Despite Democrats’ efforts, the Republican majority in Congress refuses to meet the system’s needs. As a result, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs has had to take action–most notably, preventing nondisabled veterans with incomes of $25,000 or more from receiving care.

In the future the VA’s shortfall will likely grow worse, as thousands more soldiers come back from Iraq and Afghanistan physically disabled and mentally scarred. As of November nearly 16,000 had already been counted as wounded in Iraq alone. What kind of care will we give them?

The key to building on the VA’s improvements is a secure budget that will guarantee–not just promise–that VA healthcare is fully funded every year. Representative Lane Evans has introduced a bill to do just that: the Assured Funding for Veterans’ Healthcare Act of 2005 (HR 515). Assured Funding takes into account the most important factors in determining VA funding–inflation, predictable increases in enrollment–and automatically increases the budget each year to meet those needs.

Beyond the clear benefits to veterans, there’s another reason Assured Funding is important. VA healthcare is a large-scale, government-funded system that is affordable and accessible in every part of the country–a miniature version of universal healthcare. And it’s more cost-efficient than other health programs, because the VA system takes advantage of “quantity buying” of prescription drugs, resulting in a lower cost of medicine for the veterans.

Maybe that’s the real reason so many Republicans, despite their enthusiasm for war, don’t want to give veterans the healthcare they deserve. For them, an American model for universal healthcare is dangerous. Let’s adopt Assured Funding and keep it that way.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x