Helping Nader Decide

Helping Nader Decide

There is no segment of Americans more attuned to Ralph Nader’s prophetic themes than Nation readers–many of whom supported his presidential candidacy in 2000.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

There is no segment of Americans more attuned to Ralph Nader’s prophetic themes than Nation readers–many of whom supported his presidential candidacy in 2000. Nader has now established the Nader 2004 Presidential Exploratory Committee. He has indicated that he will decide whether to run as an Independent–not as a Green–sometime before the end of January.

On his exploratory committee website, Nader asks friends to fill out a questionnaire advising him on whether to run again–and whether they will support him if he so chooses. He’s already heard from those progressives who opposed his candidacy in 2000 and from some who supported it then but do not now (see Micah L. Sifry, “Ralph Redux?” November 24, 2003). He has heard our views (see John Nichols, “Fleeing the Greens,” January 12/19). We have published letters both pro and con, reflecting a rough balance in the views of those moved to write us (see Exchange, “How Green Was My Tally,” January 5).

But there is probably no group more influential with Nader during this exploratory time than those who have supported him in the past but have thus far remained silent on the 2004 race. We urge such readers to accept his invitation to advise him now by completing the questionnaire at www.naderexplore04.com.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x