The Breakdown: Are Antitrust Laws a Thing of the Past?

The Breakdown: Are Antitrust Laws a Thing of the Past?

The Breakdown: Are Antitrust Laws a Thing of the Past?

With AT&T’s announcement that it will buy T-Mobile, the wireless industry goes from four major carriers to three. Does anyone care about antitrust laws anymore?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

With AT&T’s announcement that it will buy T-Mobile, the wireless industry goes from four major carriers to three. Does anyone care about antitrust and consumer protection laws anymore?

This past month AT&T announced plans to buy T-Mobile for $39 billion. The mega-merger will cut down the number of major wireless carriers from 4 to only 3, a consolidation of the market that doesn’t bode well for either those who rely on the industry for their livelihood or for customers. While cohorts of the wireless industry are urging Congress and the FCC not to use the merger as an excuse to create new regulations, others are beginning to wonder why even our existing antitrust and consumer protection laws don’t seem to apply anymore. On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, DC Editor Chris Hayes and journalist Barry C. Lynn track the historical trajectory of antitrust ideology in the US and discuss the legal antecedents and arguments that could be used to prevent further consolidation in major industries.

Further Reading:
Barry C. Lynn’s new book about the growing threat of monopoly capitalism, Cornered.
Barry C. Lynn and Phillip Longman on how monopolization is destroying jobs.
Annie Lowrey’s Slate article on why the AT&T merger is a bad idea.
Click here for a full transcript of this week’s episode of The Breakdown.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x