Politics / February 21, 2025

The Endless Conflicts of Interest in the Trump Administration

Each day, another ethics scandal unfolds—and each day, it gets lost in the white noise.

Sasha Abramsky

Activists wearing masks of (L-R) Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, Co-leader and main candidate of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party Alice Weidel, US President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and US Vice President JD Vance, hold up placards which read “Stop Aid, Screw the poor,” “More Warming More War,” and “Make Russia Great Again” as they stage a protest against the perceived support of the US and Russia for the far-right AfD party in front of the landmark Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, on February 20, 2025, ahead of the upcoming German elections on February 23.


(David Gannon / AFP)

I had intended to focus this week’s column on Donald Trump’s biggest scam to date—and I will get to that. But as I write this, the president has been on a manic tear on Truth Social, posting that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, is a “dictator, without elections,” a “modestly successful comedian,” and a man who needs to act fast or “he is not going to have a country left.” Zelensky—who has managed to hold off a Russian invasion for three years and who has been feted by the US Congress and parliaments throughout Europe—was doing a “terrible job,” Trump sneered.

Trump’s comments, combined with Vice President JD Vance’s performance at the Munich security conference last week, should establish beyond question that the US-Russian “negotiations” that took place in Saudi Arabia, and the proposed Putin-Trump summits that will follow, are setting the stage for a betrayal on a truly global scale.

Not since Neville Chamberlain’s craven trip to Munich in 1938, to meet with Hitler and to carve up Czechoslovakia (England’s erstwhile ally), has a superpower behaved so dishonorably to a state it had pledged to support against the aggressions of a stronger neighbor.

Foreign policy is, of course, always up for debate; and it’s a legitimate argument as to whether expanding NATO to Russia’s borders was a sensible or hubristic goal. It’s also a legitimate argument as to how involved America should be in this fight. But what Trump is doing goes far beyond that. He is, quite literally, rewriting history, declaring that Ukraine “started” the war with Russia, and echoing Putin’s line that Ukraine is the aggressor and Russia the victim. 

Why is he doing it? Probably because the Russians have dangled the possibility of huge business profits for Trump and his inner circle. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio talked of the tremendous economic opportunities that would follow a normalization of relations—and made moves to begin that normalization even absent a conclusion to the war. At the same time, Russia’s sovereign wealth fund is anticipating the return of major US companies over the coming months, after three years in which American-led sanctions efforts reduced economic contact between Russia and the West to a minimum. The Russians told Trump at the meeting in Saudi Arabia that US businesses had lost out on over $300 billion in investments since the start of the war.

The US public might not realize the enormity of what is transpiring, but I guarantee you the Ukrainians do, and I guarantee you that America’s European allies, as well as our friends elsewhere around the globe, also do. It marks the end of the post–World War II global system, and the recasting of America as a malicious, dangerous, and deeply opportunistic force, one at least as likely to sell out its allies as to defend them. In the short term, Americans might not notice their diminished global standing; in the long term, as allies flee or are driven away, as new alliances form and as new economic partnerships emerge, they most certainly will.

And for what? For the short-term grift, the irresistible lure of golden baubles, and the chance that Russian and American oligarchs can join forces and extract yet more resources and yet more profits from beleaguered, war-ravaged, Ukraine, and from all the other Eastern European countries now quaking in the shadows of Putin’s armies.

Which seems as good a place as any to pivot to my original focus for this week: Trump’s endless, almost pathological, grift, or the nonstop profiteering of this gangster government.

Trump is a master at spinning dollars out of thin air. Witness: Days before his inauguration, he launched the “$TRUMP” crypto asset. Vox reported that the value of these meme coins instantly soared, and Trump’s share alone was soon worth an astounding $58 billion.

There are many problems with this. Three in particular stand out. First, like the Dutch tulip mania in the 17th century, or any other irrational, cult-like economic craze, there are no real assets backing up meme coins. One minute, they’re worth a fortune; the next, as with the end of the tulip craze, they’re simply faded flowers. Trump will, of course, have long since cashed out by then, leaving the poor schmoes who bought into what looks remarkably like a Ponzi scheme holding a whole bunch of worthless investments.

Second, Trump has created a near-perfect arena for influence peddling: Any big business that wants his ear or wants favorable treatment from the administration knows that buying into $TRUMP will add to its value, thus indirectly enriching Trump. How much more effective this is than the grift in Trump 1.0, when overseas companies and governments simply paid inflated rates to stay at, and organize conferences in, Trump hotels. 

It’s all hiding in plain sight here, but, like any money-laundering scheme, it comes with enough plausible deniability to allow the president and his family to claim ignorance of efforts to influence them.

Third, Trump has cozied up to the crypto industry like few other leaders globally, reaping huge rewards. In the 2024 election cycle, half of all corporate donations came from the crypto industry, with most of those dollars going to pro-crypto candidates such as Trump. As soon as he came into office, Trump repaid the favor, by signing an executive order directing the US to boost the cryptocurrency industry and to potentially build up a cryptocurrency stockpile—thus giving a huge boost to the industry, including the meme coin that he now controls.

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

In normal times, that would represent an unpardonable conflict of interest. In Trump 2.0, with a quiescent Congress and fired watchdogs, ethics ombudsmen, and inspectors general, and with Elon Musk using his alignment with the president to boost his own business profile, it’s raised barely a whimper of opposition.

Each day, another ethics scandal unfolds—and each day, it gets lost in the white noise.

Take Trump’s order to the Department of Justice to no longer enforce the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and the extraordinary language contained in that White House memo, which basically encouraged US businesses interests to dole out bribes. This is a White House that feasts on conflicts of interest. Consider Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent visit to DC to meet with Trump, where Musk arranged a side-meeting. When Trump was asked whether Musk was meeting Modi as a government official or a businessman, he answered that he didn’t know, but then added, “I assume [Musk] wants to do business in India.”

This week, The New York Times reported that Trump was blending his political and business interests in arranging lucrative golf tour deals with the Saudis that could end up financially benefiting his companies through the numerous golf courses that he owns.

Also this week, Trump signed an executive order essentially giving himself direct power over regulatory agencies such as the SEC, the FDIC, the FCC, and the FEC. That’s a lot of acronyms, but basically, if it withstands the legal challenges that will almost certainly be launched against it, it’s a vast, dictatorial power grab to usurp the regulatory powers of agencies that monitor everything from the stability of the country’s banking system to the legality of trade deals to the broadcasting licenses issued to television and radio stations, through to how elections are conducted.

In one month, Trump and Musk have so trampled America’s constitutional system of governance that, when it comes to the federal government, virtually nothing remains of the checks and balances supposed to rein in a lawless leader. They are co-governing by direct fiat, bypassing the legislative, the regulatory, and the public comments processes to enact vast changes to basic governing and administrative systems for their own personal financial gains. They have weakened to the point of nonexistence the ethics guardrails intended to prevent the mixing of political and business interests. And they have declared that American policy on everything from crypto-currency to Ukraine is up for sale.

Shameful and dishonorable don’t even begin to describe this globe-wrecking administration.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Sasha Abramsky

Sasha Abramsky is the author of several books, including The American Way of PovertyThe House of Twenty Thousand Books, Little Wonder: The Fabulous Story of Lottie Dod, the World's First Female Sports Superstar, and Chaos Comes Calling: The Battle Against the Far-Right Takeover of Small-Town America. His latest book, American Carnage: How Trump, Musk, and DOGE Butchered the US Government, is available for pre-order and will be released in January.

More from The Nation

What to Do With the Ballroom in 2029?

What to Do With the Ballroom in 2029? What to Do With the Ballroom in 2029?

Kristi Kremed.

Steve Brodner

The Supreme Court Has a Serial Killer Problem

The Supreme Court Has a Serial Killer Problem The Supreme Court Has a Serial Killer Problem

In this week's Elie v. U.S., The Nation’s justice correspondent recaps a major death penalty case that came before the high court as well as the shenanigans of a man who’s angling...

Elie Mystal

House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks at a news conference at the Capitol on December 1, 2025.

Corporate Democrats Are Foolishly Surrendering the AI Fight Corporate Democrats Are Foolishly Surrendering the AI Fight

Voters want the party to get tough on the industry. But Democratic leaders are following the money instead.

Jeet Heer

Marching Against a Corrupt Regime

Marching Against a Corrupt Regime Marching Against a Corrupt Regime

People taking to the streets for democracy.

OppArt / Josh Gosfield

Attorney General Pam Bondi, Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem flank Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office, on August 25, 2025.

It Would Be Madness to Give Trump and His Toadies Even More Power It Would Be Madness to Give Trump and His Toadies Even More Power

And yet, that’s what the Supreme Court appears prepared to do.

Sasha Abramsky

Miami Mayor-elect Eileen Higgins speaks to supporters as she celebrates her victory at her election-night party held at the Miami Women's Club on December 9, 2025.

Trump Is Dragging Republicans to Crushing Defeat After Crushing Defeat Trump Is Dragging Republicans to Crushing Defeat After Crushing Defeat

The president is deeply unpopular, his policies are failing, and Republicans are losing—everywhere.

John Nichols