The Election Is Getting Down to the Wire
It seems increasingly likely is that we’re headed for a tight race that, as in 2020, will be decided by voters in a handful of states.
I hung up my prophet’s mantle in 1992, after writing a column for New York Newsday predicting—on the basis of some combination of rumor, Broadway gossip, and a couple of polls—that New York Governor Mario Cuomo would jump into the presidential race and become the next occupant of the White House. His plane to New Hampshire was supposedly waiting on the runway, the papers required to enter the Democratic primary all filled out, but Hamlet on the Hudson never got off the ground.
So when I say that things often don’t turn out as you—or at least I—expect them to, you can trust me. As I write, Vice President Kamala Harris leads former president Donald Trump nationally by a little over a point (in the RealClearPolling average) and by razor-thin margins in three of the seven swing states, with the two candidates statistically tied in Pennsylvania. But as The Guardian helpfully reminds us, Hillary Clinton had a wider lead over Trump at this point in 2016.
If that isn’t enough to keep you awake at night, October is the month for surprises. In 1980, Ronald Reagan’s campaign, fearing that a last-minute deal to free the American hostages in Iran might salvage Jimmy Carter’s chances, sent emissaries to make sure that any release would be delayed until after the election. In October 2016, FBI director James Comey decided to revive the bureau’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s e-mails. And for history buffs, in October 1844, a story published in the Ithaca Chronicle claiming that President James Polk had branded the enslaved people he’d sold at auction was revealed to be a fabrication—in the end, the attempt to disparage Polk, published earlier that fall, backfired, not only because it turned out to be a hoax but because the episode reminded voters that the Whig candidate, Henry Clay, also owned slaves.
Related Articles
What might this October bring? Apart from being reasonably confident that Harris won’t make the mistake of failing to campaign in Wisconsin—or any of the other battleground states—I wouldn’t hazard a guess. But what seems increasingly likely is that we’re headed for a tight election that, as in 2020, will be decided by voters in a handful of states. Or even, given the Electoral College math, just one state: Pennsylvania. Which is why I spent Election Day 2020 in Reading and Allentown, and why I returned to the state (where, as it happens, I’d spent my elementary school years) for two weeks this August. You can read my findings here.
But as John Nichols reminds us in his report on critical Senate races in the Midwest, even if Harris and Tim Walz win their sprint to the White House in November, the chances of actually delivering on their campaign promises will be slim indeed unless Democrats hold on to that chamber. On the other hand, should the Democrats hold the Senate and retake the House—an effort that may come down to a handful of extremely expensive races in the very unpurple states of California and New York—progressives will have a lot more to fight for, and to argue about, in 2025.
Just to add to your jitters, Elie Mystal previews the coming Supreme Court term, and Gaby Del Valle traces the hidden—you might even say surprising—history that saw this nation of immigrants turn immigration into a political lightning rod. For inspiration amid the anxiety, read Renee Bracey Sherman and Regina Mahone’s profile of Sakinah Ahad Shannon, a pioneering member of Jane, Chicago’s pre-Roe underground abortion service—a Black woman who continued to help her community even after abortion became legal. And Elizabeth Pochoda spotlights the artist Mary Sully’s astonishing take on American history and celebrity.
This month’s Books & the Arts features Jess Bergman’s review of the latest Sally Rooney novel, Jorge Cotte on the return of the British spy series Slow Horses, Michael Kazin on the long shadow of the Scopes trial, Kevin Lozano on Emily Witt’s new memoir about New York’s underground nightlife scene, and Astra Taylor on the forgotten and future history of debt resistance.
Plus we have a forum marking the anniversary of the October 7 attacks, a debate on the left’s embrace of antitrust, and our usual complement of compelling columnists. And a real treat: a selection of photos by the extraordinary photographer Susan Meiselas, who covered the Democratic convention for The Nation.
To paraphrase Tim Walz, we can sleep after November 5.
D.D. Guttenplan
Editor
Support independent journalism that does not fall in line
Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets.
Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.
As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war.
In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth.
The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more.
But this journalism is possible only with your support.
This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?
