January 20, 1937: FDR Is Inaugurated for the Second Time

January 20, 1937: FDR Is Inaugurated for the Second Time

January 20, 1937: FDR Is Inaugurated for the Second Time

“A thin but pleasant sort of rhetoric” suffused FDR’s second inaugural address, The Nation thought.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This was the first time a presidential inauguration took place on January 20, rather than March 4, as initially prescribed in the Constitution. The adjustment was provided for in the Twentieth Amendment, proposed in early 1932 and ratified in January 1933. The first president to be newly inaugurated as president on January 20—rather than for a second, third or fourth term, as for Roosevelt, or to begin a new term after having completed his predecessor’s, as for Truman—was Dwight D. Eisenhower on January 20, 1953. In an editorial note in the issue of January 30, 1937, The Nation reviewed FDR’s second inaugural address.

We doubt that the inaugural address will go down in history as a great state paper. Neither in its literary quality nor in the tenor of its program did it carry conviction. There was a thin but pleasant sort of rhetoric about it, and it was drenched in a moral good-will, but it failed to recapture the ringing faith, the clear call to action, and the decisiveness of the first inaugural address. Either Mr. Roosevelt must have some sort of reluctancy to bring out his best powers, or else we have grown immune to his generalities during the last four years. Yet the address might have been far worse. It might have struck the “era of good feeling” note, or the complacent note of America’s return to the pre-1929 Golden Age. That would probably have been Mr. Langdon’s inaugural, had he been given a chance at one. Instead, Mr. Roosevelt dedicated himself to reaching the “happy valley” of permanently improved living standards under democratic procedures. His address was distinctive as a picture, drawn for the first time by an American President, of poverty under capitalism. But the President did not make clear, even in general terms, how he would reach the happy valley. Is it to be by a steady and gradual march to a firm control over industry? Or is it to be by dotting the i‘s and crossing the t’s of the old New Deal?

To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x