What Obama Won’t Tell Us About Afghanistan Tonight

What Obama Won’t Tell Us About Afghanistan Tonight

What Obama Won’t Tell Us About Afghanistan Tonight

Drawing down soldiers by 2016 isn’t fast enough—just look at the many civilians killed by the US military and the prisoners tortured by US-trained forces.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email


A soldier stands guard at an outpost in Afghanistan. (Reuters/Bob Strong.)

Here’s what President Obama won’t tell you tonight about Afghanistan.

What he will tell you, of course, is that the United States is drawing down its presence there. According to The Washington Post and AP, Obama will say “that 34,000 US troops will return from Afghanistan within a year,” reducing by about half the current American presence. And, says the Post, “The Pentagon is pushing a plan that would keep about 8,000 US troops in Afghanistan once the NATO military mission there ends in 2014 but significantly shrink the contingent over the following two years.” By 2016, says the Post, the Pentagon still wants to keep between 3,500 and 6,000 troops in-country.

That’s not fast enough. And part of the reason it’s not fast enough is contained in what Obama won’t say.

First, he won't say that both the United Nations and, now, the Afghan government admit that torture of detainees is widespread by the Afghan National Police. On January 20, the UN released a report reporting in some detail that torture was widely used by Afghan security forces, noting that “torture persists and remains a serious concern in numerous detention facilities across Afghanistan.” And the UN’s report was extensively documented:

UNAMA’s 139-page report Treatment of Conflict-Related Detainees in Afghan Custody: One Year On is based on interviews with 635 conflict-related detainees held by the Afghan National Police, National Directorate of Security, Afghan National Army or Afghan Local Police, visits to 89 detention facilities in 30 provinces from October 2011 to October 2012, extensive interviews with multiple relevant interlocutors and on rigorous analysis, corroboration and examination of documentary and other material.

Yesterday, the government of Afghanistan admitted that it was accurate. Reports the Times:

An Afghan government panel on Monday acknowledged widespread torture of detainees, after a two-week investigation of a United Nations report citing rampant abuses.

At a news conference in Kabul, Afghanistan’s capital, the panel’s director said its inquiry had confirmed evidence that nearly half of the 284 prisoners interviewed in three provinces had been tortured during arrest or questioning.

Somewhat ironically, the Times adds that, despite the fact that nearly half the prisoners were tortured (by American-trained forces), torture is not “systematic,” according to the Afghans.

The second thing you won’t hear from Obama, who will undoubtedly mention the twenty children killed in Newtown, Connecticut, is that hundreds upon hundreds of Afghan children have been killed by the United States in Afghanistan.

A recent report by the Committee on the Rights of the Child, based on UN data, concluded that “attacks by US military forces in Afghanistan, including air strikes, have reportedly killed hundreds of children over the last four years, according to the UN body monitoring the rights of children.” And the UN committee take urged the United States to take “concrete and firm precautionary measures and prevent indiscriminate use of force to ensure that no further killings and maiming of civilians, including children, take place.”

But don’t expect President Obama, even as he reduces the American presence, to acknowledge these deaths. NATO has already pooh-poohed the UN report, calling it “categorically unfounded” and “false.” In doing so, NATO and the American command in Afghanistan echo the National Rifle Association in sheer ignorance of the facts.

For another example of a drawn-out, misguided government process, look at Senate Republicans' questioning of defense secretary nominee Chuck Hagel.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x