Hope on Israel-Palestine? Maybe, Just Maybe

Hope on Israel-Palestine? Maybe, Just Maybe

Hope on Israel-Palestine? Maybe, Just Maybe

But Netanyahu and his ally, extremist Sheldon Adelson, are twin wrecking balls.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket


US Secretary of State John Kerry speaks at a news conference at the State Department. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Something might actually be happening in the Middle East, that is, on the Israel-Palestinian front. It’s not an area that’s usually visited by The Dreyfuss Report, because it seems permanently stalemated and stuck. (We’re talking decades here.) But Secretary of State John Kerry might be up to something.

So I’m willing to suspend my skepticism and disbelief for a few months.

As The New York Times says in an editorial today:

Secretary of State John Kerry has seemed perpetually in motion in the Middle East since he assumed office, shuttling from one meeting to another with top Israeli and Palestinian officials over the last four months in an effort to revive peace negotiations. He has divulged few details, and his overall strategy is unclear. But it would be foolish to write off his peacemaking diplomacy, as some have. So far, he seems to be moving in a determined and encouraging fashion on a series of interlocking steps.

And I agree, it would be foolish to write off what Kerry is doing, especially since President Obama has been hinting—ever since his “listening and learning” visit to Israel and Palestine this spring—that he may be thinking about putting forward a peace plan of some sort.

Indeed, Kerry has been a one-man sandstorm in the Middle East, constantly meeting Israeli and Palestinian officials, and this week—in connection with an Israel-Palestinian group of capitalists called Breaking the Impasse, and in conjunction with a billionaire friend of Kerry’s, Tim Collins, and the World Economic Forum—Kerry put forth a plan to gather $4 billion to rebuild and revitalize the economy of the occupied West Bank.

The plan comes just as the International Crisis Group released an important new report on the situation in the occupied West Bank, where economic crisis and incipient unrest have led to suggestions that a third intifada might erupt. The ICG report concludes:

However thick the insulation, it is doubtful it can withstand the test of time or the pressures of mounting frustration. Many conditions for an uprising are objectively in place: political discontent, lack of hope, economic fragility, increased violence and an overwhelming sense that security cooperation serves an Israeli—not Palestinian—interest. At some point—and triggered by an unexpected event—Palestinians may well decide their long-run well-being would be better served by instability, and only by rocking the boat might they come closer to their desired destination. The result likely will differ from the second intifada, as the second differed markedly from the first. But short of steps to unify and reinforce the legitimacy of Palestinian institutions and move Israelis and Palestinians toward a comprehensive peace, another destabilizing event sooner or later is inevitable. In buying time, aid dollars go only so far.

At first glance, it might seem like the Kerry plan is an updated version of the idea, supported by Benjamin Netanyahu and Co., to freeze the political part of the peace process while allowing the Palestinians to improve their economic standing. But both Kerry and the others involved say that’s not the idea.

According to the Times:

The group, calling itself Breaking the Impasse, has met more than 20 times in the past year and includes about 300 executives of high-tech, construction, beverage and insurance companies, as well as banks, and many Palestinian investors from abroad. Representatives of the group said they met on Thursday with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and have also met with President Abbas.

The two leaders of Breaking the Impasse, Yossi Vardi of Israel and Munib al-Masri of Palestine, seem to agree that not only economics but politics has to be involved, and Masri supports the notion of two-state solution based on the 1967 borders and an Arab capital in Jerusalem.

Meanwhile, reminding all of us how hard it will be to budge the hard-line Israeli coalition, one of its chief backers—and the man who singlehandedly financed right-wing Republicans last year and then Mitt Romney—was in Israel to spout all sorts of ultra-provocative statements. Listen to Sheldon Adelson, the extremist billionaire and gambling king:

“How can you move a ball forward when the Israelis legitimately want peace and the Palestinians want Israel piece by piece?”… “Have you ever heard any Palestinian say, ‘We have to give up our hope of destroying Israel in favor of living in peace.’?”…

“They teach their children that Jews are descended from swine and apes, pigs and monkeys.”

Adelson added, for good measure, that Palestinians were really just Egyptians or “southern Syrians,” until the Palestine Liberation Organization “came along with a pitcher of Kool-Aid and gave it to everybody to drink and sold them the idea of Palestinians.”

Earlier this year, of course, Kerry pushed the Arab League to revamp and reissue its 2002 Arab Peace Initiative. I’m the last to overestimate how difficult it will be make any progress here, absent a willingness by President Obama to push Israel, hard, to make the deal.

Interested in more coverage of Israel and Palestine? Read Anna Lekas Miller’s report on settlements in East Jerusalem here.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x