Inside True the Vote

Inside True the Vote

A spinoff of the King Street Patriots Texas Tea Party, True the Vote aims to have 1 million poll watchers in place by November. 

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

One of the first sights to greet attendees of the True the Vote national summit was the face of Martin Luther King Jr. printed above the quote, “PEACE if possible. TRUTH at all costs,” on T-shirts for sale in the hotel lobby. Of course, King didn’t say those words; the quote is from Martin Luther, the German theologian, who predates King by about four centuries. But that was beside the point for True the Vote members, who gathered in Houston on a late April weekend to rally against a darker “truth” that only they seemed privy to: an epidemic of voter fraud that has taken over the American electoral system.


A spinoff of the King Street Patriots Texas Tea Party, a group that gained notoriety during the 2008 and 2010 elections for harassing and intimidating Houston voters, True the Vote supports the voter ID laws championed by ALEC and other right-wing groups. But its primary role in the effort to suppress the vote will be manifest on election day. By then, True the Vote hopes to have trained a million poll watchers around the country to crack down on voter fraud—people voting on behalf of dead citizens, undocumented immigrants attempting to vote and people voting twice.

It is an article of faith among True the Vote members that such cases are legion and marred recent elections in Texas, for example. But as the San Antonio Express reported, “fewer than five ‘illegal voting’ complaints involving voter impersonations were filed with the Texas Attorney General’s Office from the 2008 and 2010 general elections in which more than 13 million voters participated.” Nationwide, the prevalence of voter fraud is also freakonomically low; in 2007, after a five-year effort to prosecute voter fraud, George W. Bush’s Justice Department reported just 120 charges and eighty-six convictions.

This lack of evidence, however, didn’t seem to disturb True the Vote’s national elections coordinator Bill Ouren, who one day hopes to have at least two sets of poll watchers at every polling station in America. At the summit, Ouren described how voters should feel while under the gaze of True the Vote observers: “Like driving and seeing the police following you.”

In his presentation, Ouren outlined the distinction between official election workers and poll watchers—and then gave guidance about how to blur such lines. He encouraged activists to “build relationships with election administrators” and their party leaders because “they control access to the vote.” He then asked Harris County poll workers and watchers in the audience to stand; almost half the room did. Ouren also singled out Harris County Clerk Stan Stanart for a round of applause.

According to Denise Lieberman, an attorney with the Advancement Project who tracks the advocacy of partisan election groups, including True the Vote, such fraternization between vigilante poll watchers and government officials is cause for concern. For example, the Advancement Project has documented True the Vote’s practice of obtaining voter lists from election officials to identify voters they believe should be purged. True the Vote also gets lists from election officials of voters who have moved out of their districts, then sends out mailings to see which ones come back as undeliverable. The activists use that information, says Lieberman, to create lists for challenging voters on election day, a process called “voter caging.”

There was quite a bit of talk at True the Vote about “protecting minorities” from voter fraud. The conference heard from African-American speakers like former ACORN staffer Anita MonCrief and former Congressman Artur Davis, who blamed corrupt black machine leaders for his loss in the 2010 primary for Alabama governor. There were plenty of statements about helping African-Americans and Latinos comply with new, restrictive voter ID laws.

But there was one thing conspicuously missing from the summit—any mention of expanding voter participation among voters of color. No one said, “I want more African-Americans and Latinos registered to vote, and I want higher voter turnout among those parts of the electorate”—a particularly galling absence, given that Texas has one of the lowest voter turnouts in the nation. In fact, groups that work to increase minority turnout—the Brennan Center for Justice, the Advancement Project, the NAACP, MALDEF, the ACLU, the Justice Department—were frequently named throughout the conference as organizations that undermine the integrity of elections.

“You are the true heirs to the civil rights movement, not your opponents,” said former DOJ employee J. Christian Adams, who crusaded at the summit against the New Black Panther Party and Eric Holder’s Justice Department, claiming that both strive to intimidate white voters. Indeed, all throughout the summit, True the Vote attempted to cloak its cause in the language and iconography of the civil rights movement, as if wearing Martin Luther King Jr. T-shirts would obscure its agenda. It’s a logic as faulty as the T-shirts.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x