Every investigative journalist rightly reveres Daniel Ellsberg, the former US Marine officer who exposed so many of the lies told by the US government about the Vietnam War.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
By leaking the Pentagon Papers to The New York Times, Ellsberg revealed the illegal US bombing of Laos and Cambodia—and helped to end the war itself.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
When Wikileaks founder Julian Assange fought his desperate battle in London’s Central Criminal Court to avoid extradition to the United States, Ellsberg tried to come to his rescue.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
As well he might. Because the story of Julian Assange is an action replay of Ellsberg half a century later.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Ellsberg, like Assange, was put on trial for spying. Ellsberg, like Assange faced a lifetime in prison, only for the charges to be dismissed because of government misconduct against him.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
He told the London Court that he felt an immense fellow feeling with the Wikileaks founder.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
In an important statement, Ellsberg—the doyen of whistleblowers—explained that while he was serving in Vietnam, detailed knowledge of US war crimes remained confined to a tiny circle.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
By contrast, he pointed out that more than 100,000 people had access to the Iraq and Afghan war logs leaked by Chelsea Manning.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
This meant, said Ellsberg, “torture and assassination have been normalised.”
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
And it is certainly true that the Wikileaks revelations has shone a horrifying light on crimes casually committed by the US during the so called “War on Terrorism.”
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Wikileaks published a video of US helicopter gunmen laughing as they shot at and killed unarmed civilians in Iraq. Fifteen individuals were killed in the attack, including a Reuters photographer and his assistant.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
The US military refused to discipline the perpetrators of this grotesque crime, who remain unpunished. But the US government has thrown the book at the man who revealed their crimes.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Wikileaks revealed that the total number of civilian casualties in Iraq was far greater than previously admitted by the US government. It disclosed the abuse meted out to the inmates at Guantanamo Bay, as well as the fact that 150 innocent inmates were held for years without charge.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Clive Stafford Smith, who has represented 87 prisoners from Guantánamo Bay, paid tribute to the importance of the Wikileaks revelations in enabling him to prove that the charges against his clients had been false.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Many other revelations, though less horrifying, were almost as embarrassing for the US and its allies. I was in the Beirut ten years ago when Wikileaks revealed that the Lebanese defense minister had conspired with the United States to facilitate an Israeli invasion of his country in 2008.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Wikileaks cables revealed how, over a two and a half hour lunch with American diplomats, Elias Murr spelled out which parts of country areas that Israeli jets should hit. They also revealed that he had ordered the Lebanese army “not to get involved in any fighting and to fulfil a civil defence role.” This is just one example and thousands, and mercifully the 2008 assault never happened.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
It’s not hard to imagine the fury and embarrassment within the United States defense and military establishment at disclosures like these. And it makes the US determination to prosecute and convict Assange totally rational. They have the strongest possible incentive to make an example of him in order to warn others of the consequences of doing the same.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Any story which depends on obtaining documents from US government sources will become impossibly dangerous. Any journalists concerned could find themselves subject to an extradition request.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
The more serious the story, the greater the danger of extradition and prosecution.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
A simple mental experiment demonstrates the damage the extradition of Julian Assange to the United States will do.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Let’s imagine that a foreign dissident was being prosecuted by Russian President Vladimir Putin on espionage charges.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Let’s further suppose that his true offense was bring to light war crimes committed by the Russian armed forces, including video footage of the slaughter of unarmed civilians and two Reuters journalists.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
And that the UN special rapporteur on torture, after a long and scrupulous inspection of the evidence, had stated that this dissident displayed “all the symptoms typical for prolonged exposure to psychological torture.”
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Now let’s stretch credulity beyond breaking point. Let’s suppose that President Putin was pressuring the United Kingdom to extradite the dissident to Russia to face trial on charges that could condemn that dissident to spend the rest of his life in a Russian maximum security prison.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
There would be outrage in Britain. Prime Minister Boris Johnson would make a statement on the floor of the House of Commons declaring that he would never bow to Russian pressure. Powerful editorials in every British paper would denounce Putin, while setting out Britain’s respect for international law.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Yet Julian Assange in virtually in every respect faces identical circumstances to the fictitious Russian dissident I described above.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
With one crucial difference: namely that it’s Joe Biden’s United States rather than Vladimir Putin’s Russian which demands his extradition.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
With the natural result that British Home Secretary Priti Patel has timidly given in to the US demand.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Patel is a notoriously authoritarian home secretary, but in truth I can’t believe any of her predecessors—Labour or Conservative—would have reached a different decision. This is because Britain values beyond measure her security relationship with the United States.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Yet Britain and the United States love to boast about their commitment to media freedom. Patel’s judgement shows that this claim is fraudulent.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
If President Biden truly cared about media freedom he would have cancelled the extradition request months ago.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Such deep hypocrisy is a propaganda gift to Vladimir Putin. The Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Maria Zakharova used Assange’s arrest three years ago to mock the double standards of the west. “The hand of ‘democracy’” she noted, “squeezes the throat of freedom.”
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Point taken.
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
Popular
"swipe left below to view more authors"Swipe →
