Repressed memory is almost unknown in my country, Ireland. There has been one conviction in the history of the state based partly on RM. It was--naturally--that of a former nun, Nora Wall (Sister Dominic of the Sisters of Mercy). In July 1999 she also became the first person in our history to get a life sentence for rape. A few days later the case collapsed when the "victim" and her "witness" gave a paid newspaper interview in which their names were published for the first time. Both had a history of false allegations that had been concealed from the defense, but one of the "witness's" previous victims recognised her name and the prosecution case then fell apart.
There was a third unique feature about the Nora Wall case. She and her co-defendant Paul McCabe were originally accused of two rapes--one of which was alleged to have occurred on the victim's twelfth birthday. McCabe was a homeless schizophrenic and the accuser no doubt assumed that he could not produce an alibi. By an extraordinary chance there was an official record of where he was on the day--and it was nowhere near the residential institution where the rape was supposed to have happened. The jury duly found the two accused innocent on that charge, but convicted them on the other rape count--which did not specify an exact date.
If an alleged rape victim is exposed as a liar on one important issue, there is normally no way in which a jury will convict the accused. I am sure this is as true of an American jury as of an Irish one. Nora Wall was convicted because she had been a nun, i.e., because of anti-clerical hatred that is no different from the anti-Semitic variety. Paul Shanley is a very different character, but the reason for his conviction is the same.
The best account of Nora Wall's trial is an article in Studies magazine by Breda O'Brien (Winter 2006); "Miscarriage of Justice: Paul McCabe and Nora Wall.
The following is an extract from the Judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal on D.P.P. v Nora Wall on December 16, 2005.:"It is now also accepted by the respondent that there had been significant non-disclosure in this case, including (a) the information that Regina Walsh had made, but not pursued, an allegation of being raped in England and (b) the non-disclosure of Regina Walsh’s very proximate and material psychiatric history. It seems to this court that the applicant was further prejudiced during the course of her trial by evidence of which the defence had no prior notification, namely, that Regina Walsh recalled the alleged episodes of rape by reference to ‘flashbacks and/or retrieved memory’. There was no scientific evidence of any sort adduced to explain the phenomenon of ‘flashbacks’ and/or ‘retrieved memory’, nor was the applicant in any position to meet such a case in the absence of prior notification thereof."
Not only has Ireland little experience of repressed memory, we have none of Satanic ritual abuse. Both are developments (or distortions?) of Freudian concepts. The Catholic Church denounced Freud because his ideas went against Catholic dogmas on sin, free will and personal responsibility. By the time the Church lost its influence in Ireland, Satanic abuse was dead and repressed memory was under strong attack--as JoAnn Wypijewski demonstrates. This does not mean that false allegations of child abuse are not a problem in Ireland. It does mean that Irish false accusers are straightforward liars and anti-clerics. They are not semi-deluded idiots and fanatics!
Apr 7 2009 - 9:11pm