Society / December 12, 2025

Keeping the Police Out of Pregnancy Care

We must be vigilant in keeping law enforcement out of exam rooms.

Lourdes A. Rivera and Dr. Jamila Perritt
(Shutterstock.com)

Imagine you’re pregnant and excited for your new baby—tracking kicks, setting up the crib, picking out names. Then comes sudden, unexpected pain. You lose your pregnancy at home, terrified and bleeding, and you do what you’ve always taught your kids to do in an emergency: you call for help.

The paramedics arrive—and with them, police. The questions come before the care: How far along were you? How long did you wait before calling 911? Did you get regular prenatal care? Were you excited to be pregnant? Have you taken any drugs? Instead of prioritizing your physical and emotional well-being, you’re suddenly facing criminal charges, worried about losing your kids, and trying to find a lawyer you can afford.

Cases like these are not unique. They have been happening across the country in the first two years since Roe v. Wade fell. Pregnancy Justice and our research partners have documented more than 400 prosecutions across 16 states for pregnancy, miscarriage, and abortion—as police and prosecutors, often alerted by hospitals and healthcare workers when someone seeks care, treat medical emergencies as crimes. This is pregnancy criminalization: when someone is charged with a crime because of their behavior during pregnancy, or because of a pregnancy loss, such as miscarriage or stillbirth. These charges are typically not for abortion-specific crimes; in fact, at least for now, most states cannot charge the pregnant person with an abortion-related crime. Instead, prosecutors misuse and misapply various statutes to charge pregnant people with anything from “child” abuse, neglect, or endangerment, to murder, manslaughter, or abuse of a corpse.

Pregnancy criminalization in the United States started long before the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn Roe, but the guardrails that once existed to protect women from being criminalized for pregnancy loss or abortion are now off. Today, it is a dangerous framework driving these prosecutions, one that aims to treat fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses as “persons” with rights, and recasts behavior during pregnancy as a potential crime. In practice, this kind of criminalization falls hardest on low-income, Black, brown, Indigenous, and rural communities—those most at risk of over-policing and a lack of affordable health care or legal counsel.

In many cases, the “evidence” used to prosecute a pregnant person is a positive urine toxicology test or drug screen—often ordered and shared with child welfare authorities and the police without a patient’s knowledge or informed consent. Some positive drug tests are later shown to be false; others are a result of prescribed medications; still others reflect substance use or substance use disorder (SUD). And yet this positive test is often enough to charge a pregnant patient with a felony for allegedly putting their pregnancy at “risk” of potential harm, often resulting in the removal of their other children from their care. It’s why leading medical organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, recommend against the use of drug testing to punish or criminalize people who use drugs during pregnancy.

The application of child abuse or neglect statutes to embryos and fetuses is a slippery and dangerous slope. The practice quickly expands: Any pregnancy loss is treated with suspicion. As this punitive net widens, the actual systems that support the health and well-being of patients and their infants—prenatal care, mental health care, and treatment for SUD—are being stripped away. We are witnessing the gutting of Medicaid, which is worsening maternity care deserts, and the defunding of proven treatment for SUD, which was already insufficient to meet capacity, even as overdose deaths rise among pregnant and postpartum people. If policymakers and legislators were truly interested in improving outcomes for pregnant people and their babies, they would invest in care, not punishment.

Repro Nation

Monthly. A collection of stories, analysis, and resources on the global struggle for reproductive freedom.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

But by participating in nonconsensual drug testing and reporting of those results to government agencies and legal entities, hospitals and clinicians are inviting law enforcement into exam rooms, initiating and facilitating the criminalization and incarceration of pregnant people. Each decision amounts to centering the institution’s needs at the expense of the patients, who are then blamed for not getting pregnancy “right.”

It can be overwhelming to navigate the complicated health care system as a pregnant person, whether giving birth or seeking care for pregnancy loss; the system was designed that way. One powerful way to interrupt this cycle of punishment is by staying alert and informed. We can all help our community members, neighbors, loved ones, and family members by going with them to visits and listening, taking notes, and asking questions with their safety in mind. In the midst of so much political chaos, our most important tool is information about our rights and how to protect those rights. For example, a person can exercise their Fifth Amendment right by refusing to talk to the police without legal representation present. It’s essential not to let unconstitutional threats and actions distract us from demanding that our freedoms be protected.

Here’s the good news: People seeking care and those who want to support them don’t have to do it alone. Clinicians and hospitals have agency too, and organizers around the country are working hard to ensure they know this. Health systems can refuse to allow law enforcement into the exam room, by prohibiting non-required and nonconsensual reporting and by ordering tests to support care rather than to build criminal cases. These strategies work. In New York City, a policy shift like this cut toxicology-only reports to child welfare by 80 percent with no negative impact on infant health outcomes. We can collectively advocate for more cities and states to follow their lead and protect families.

Prosecutors also should state plainly that no one should be criminalized for pregnancy loss, abortion, or substance use and they will refuse to prosecute those who are. Medical education should teach medical trainees about providing patients with health care that is responsive to their needs and supportive of their goals, not making assumptions about what’s “best” for a patient and increasing their risk of criminalization. If people are facing threats of criminalization for their pregnancy outcomes, they can reach out to organizations like Pregnancy Justice to get the legal support they need.

Our goal should be simple: safeguard the health of the pregnant and postpartum person. That commitment improves outcomes for newborns, for patients after pregnancy loss, and for families. But it is going to take all of us. Our personal advocacy for our loved ones, our laws, policies, and medical guidelines must support one premise: No one should be criminalized for being pregnant, however that pregnancy ends.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Lourdes A. Rivera

Lourdes A. Rivera is the president of Pregnancy Justice, a legal nonprofit and advocacy organization that defends pregnant people’s rights.

Dr. Jamila Perritt

Dr. Jamila Perritt is a fellowship trained, board-certified obstetrician and gynecologist and the president and CEO of Physicians for Reproductive Health, a physician-led organization that mobilizes the medical community, educating and organizing providers, using medicine and science to advance access to reproductive healthcare for all people.

More from The Nation

The Pork Oligarchs of Iowa Have Local Politicians in Their Pockets

The Pork Oligarchs of Iowa Have Local Politicians in Their Pockets The Pork Oligarchs of Iowa Have Local Politicians in Their Pockets

Jeff and Deb Hansen spend hundreds of thousands to keep the state friendly to their business.

Column / Chuck Collins

How Misogyny Fuels Fascism

How Misogyny Fuels Fascism How Misogyny Fuels Fascism

Nina Burleigh, the Rev. Naomi Washington-Leapheart, and Annie Wilkinson speak to Laura Flanders about the sexism at the heart of Trumpism.

Q&A / Laura Flanders

A US-Israeli strike hit Tehran's Azadi Sport Complex on March 5, 2026.

The Bombing of Iran’s Azadi Stadium Is Straight Out of Israel’s Gaza Script The Bombing of Iran’s Azadi Stadium Is Straight Out of Israel’s Gaza Script

Israel has long targeted sport facilities and athletes in Gaza. Now with US help, it’s doing the same thing in Iran.

Dave Zirin

Taking Aim at Overpaid CEOs

Taking Aim at Overpaid CEOs Taking Aim at Overpaid CEOs

Landmark San Francisco and Los Angeles ballot initiatives aim to hike taxes on corporations with huge gaps between CEO and worker pay.

Feature / Sarah Anderson

Why Meatpacking Workers, Some Facing Deportation, Voted to Strike

Why Meatpacking Workers, Some Facing Deportation, Voted to Strike Why Meatpacking Workers, Some Facing Deportation, Voted to Strike

The workers at the JBS plant in Greeley, Colorado, voted overwhelmingly for a strike last month.

Photo Essay / Mary Anne Andrei

President Donald Trump flanked by Vice President JD Vance, from left and House Speaker Mike Johnson during the 2026 State of the Union address.

Why Does the Supreme Court Treat Trump Like a “Regular” President? Why Does the Supreme Court Treat Trump Like a “Regular” President?

The emperor is stark naked, but thanks to a misguided legal doctrine, the Republican justices keep insisting he’s fully clothed.

Column / Elie Mystal