Editorial / April 8, 2025

The Epidemic of Capitulation Suggests the Liberal Order Has Been Rotting From Within

What old-school civics taught us about checks and balances isn’t working. The absence of a will to fight, to defend the institutions of liberal democracy, is breathtaking.

Jodi Dean for The Nation
A man holding up a US flag and a sign that reads, "What kind of lawyer rolls over and plays dead? A Paul, Weiss lawyer."
People hold signs as they protest outside of the offices of Paul, Weiss on March 25 in New York City.(Michael M. Santiago / Getty Images)

The institutions of civil society, the organizations and practices that give democracy its substance, are crumbling. The word of the day is capitulation. It’s astounding how fast the liberal order is collapsing. Those charged with its preservation are bowing to the will of a would-be king and a tech lord who is so empowered by his billions that laws and norms don’t apply to him. This suggests that the rot—the disbelief in the system, the sense that it serves little more than the personal ends of power and privilege—is deep and long-standing.

The blame does not rest solely on Trump and Musk. They announced their intentions. More concerning is the rapid capitulation to their demands. The absence of a will to fight, to defend the institutions of liberal democracy, is breathtaking. Yes, these institutions were and are flawed. They often fail to live up to their rhetoric and ideals. But now the ideals have been smashed. It’s power, money, and self-interest all the way up and down the chains of relations where rule by men has replaced rule by law.

Columbia University threw its students, faculty, and reputation under the bus just for a chance to restore some of the $400 million in federal grants the Trump administration canceled on March 7. A powerful New York law firm, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, agreed to provide Trump with $40 million in free legal services so that it wouldn’t be subject to the president’s order barring its members from federal buildings and suspending their security clearances. Neither the university nor the firm fought back—although surely they could have. It appears that they didn’t because they believe more in money and privilege than they do in truth and justice. For many, it probably seems naïve not to.

These capitulations follow Chuck Schumer’s failure to use the little leverage the Democrats had in the budget process to push back against Trump’s cuts. They also continue the concessions that started immediately after the election. Recall, ABC News settled a defamation suit Trump had brought in retaliation for on-air comments by anchor George Stephanopoulos, agreeing to donate $15 million to Trump’s presidential library. Meta settled a suit Trump brought against Facebook (and Instagram) following his suspension from the platform after the January 6 uprising. The company ponied up $25 million, with $22 million going to Trump’s presidential library. In case that wasn’t enough to establish himself as a reliable vassal, Mark Zuckerberg bent the knee still further, eliminating fact-checkers and loosening content moderation on Meta’s platforms.

Trump is shaking down firms for money and using money to shake down institutions. His mode is plunder and predation. He demands loyalty and punishes those who have crossed him. Leaders in media, law, and academia are servilely kissing the ring.

In his “Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men,” Jean-Jacques Rousseau describes the advance of inequality in three stages. The final one transforms legitimate into arbitrary power. Rousseau writes:

Here, all private individuals become equals once again, because they are nothing, and once subjects have no law other than the will of the master and the master has no other guide than his passions, notions of good and principles of justice vanish once more. Everything here is reduced to the law of the strongest alone.

Current Issue

Cover of April 2026 Issue

Our institutions are self-destructing. What old-school civics taught us about checks and balances isn’t working. Now the fight is all the more urgent and dangerous. Many of us have taken for granted a system where people like us would ultimately be OK, so long as we did our jobs and kept our heads down. Some of us have felt secure enough to stick our necks out, armed with the sense that what is just and right and good will prevail. A few of us have been confident that facts and truth would redeem us when we faced our day in court. These days are gone.

Our fight can’t be to bring them back—at least not in the old way. It has to be for something better, for an economy oriented toward meeting needs, not making profit, for social relations of equality and mutual respect. This is a fight we can we win.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Jodi Dean

Jodi Dean is a professor of politics at Hobart and William Smith Colleges,in Geneva, New York. Her most recent book is Capital's Grave: Neofeudalism and the New Class Struggle.

The Nation

Founded by abolitionists in 1865, The Nation has chronicled the breadth and depth of political and cultural life, from the debut of the telegraph to the rise of Twitter, serving as a critical, independent, and progressive voice in American journalism.

More from The Nation

Demonstrators at a rally against the SAVE America Act outside the US Capitol

How the SAVE Act Seeks to Undermine the Right to Vote How the SAVE Act Seeks to Undermine the Right to Vote

After you strip away the lies about rampant voter fraud, the GOP bill is a frontal assault on hard-won protections of the franchise.

Anthony Conwright

The Senate Proves Once Again That It’s the World’s Most Useless Deliberative Body

The Senate Proves Once Again That It’s the World’s Most Useless Deliberative Body The Senate Proves Once Again That It’s the World’s Most Useless Deliberative Body

Despite his denying the legitimacy of Biden’s election and making violent threats, Markwayne Mullin breezed through his Senate confirmation to become the new head of the DHS.

Chris Lehmann

AI Makes Life Easier… for AI

AI Makes Life Easier… for AI AI Makes Life Easier… for AI

Scraping our creativity and our jobs.

OppArt / Tjeerd Royaards

An election worker sorts mail-in ballots for the 2024 presidential election in Martinez, California, on Election Day.

The Supreme Court Looks Likely to Cave on Mail-In Ballots The Supreme Court Looks Likely to Cave on Mail-In Ballots

The GOP shouldn’t win this case, but the fact that Trump has been throwing a tantrum about it for years means they likely will.

Elie Mystal

A screenshot from an AI-funded ad in support of North Carolina congressional candidate Valerie Foushee.

AI Is the New AIPAC AI Is the New AIPAC

Companies like Anthropic are powering a new election spending boom that’s just as deceptive and destructive as anything the pro-Israel lobby has done.

Usamah Andrabi