Waving Goodbye to the Neoliberal Democratic Party
Hillary Clinton’s DNC speech marked the end of the centrist consensus of the Clinton–Obama years.
Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton waves as she leaves the stage after speaking on the first day of the Democratic National Convention at the United Center in Chicago on August 19, 2024.
(Kamil Krzaczynski / AFP via Getty Images)
Chicago—Hillary Clinton received a rapturous ovation as she strode confidently to the podium at the Democratic National Convention last night. Her voice still strong, she was a pro at work, celebrating Joe Biden while taking shots at Donald Trump. Her goal was clearly to portray Kamala Harris’s candidacy as a completion of her historic mission: “Together, we’ve put a lot of cracks in the highest, hardest glass ceiling. And tonight, tonight’s so close to breaking through once and for all.”
She roused the crowd, exhorting them to fight. But at the same time, she inadvertently revealed just how far the Democratic Party has moved from the politics of the Clinton and Obama eras. Harris presents herself as a fighter for working people on basic bread-and-butter issues. In public, Harris treats the fact that she will be the first mixed-race woman president as almost an afterthought.
The contrast between Hillary Clinton and Harris is telling. The centrist Washington consensus of the Clinton era is no more. While Obama’s two terms could be characterized as a continuation of the Bill Clinton years (with, as one pundit put it, Hillary running in 2016 for Clinton’s fifth term), Trump’s victory in 2016 and Biden’s four years began a dramatic break. The neoliberalism that Clinton and Obama championed—deregulation, free trade, fiscal austerity—has proved a failure. The neglect of America’s manufacturing base and of the workers and communities savaged by plant closings was both a political and an economic folly. The Clintons and Obamas are still stars of the party. Veteran Clinton-Obama aides and advisers still pack the DNC and fill roles in the Harris campaign. On the eve of the convention, The New York Times reported on the “quietly held bond” between Hillary Clinton and Harris, but progressives have won the argument inside the party.
Biden’s valedictory speech exposed the break. He rightly celebrated the fruits of his embrace of new, bold progressive policy: industrial policy focused on the transition to sustainable energy, rebuilding the country’s infrastructure, investing in new technology to be made here, imposing tariffs to protect vital industries, standing with workers, taking on Big Pharma, challenging monopolies, and more.
Sadly, the one area where there has been no significant change—a foreign policy based on the presumption that America is the “indispensable nation” tasked with policing the world—continues to plague our country and our politics, as we careen from one costly debacle to another: Think Iraq, Libya, the misbegotten War on Terror, and now Ukraine, the horror in Gaza, and the growing peril in the South China Sea.
The course Kamala Harris will pursue remains to be seen. The corporate wing of the party is already pressing to roll back antitrust efforts. The Times depiction the circle of her closest advisers isn’t particularly reassuring. But her early campaign choices—selecting Governor Tim Walz as her running mate, embracing the Biden break, presenting herself as member of the middle class, standing with unions, highlighting her commitment to take on Big Pharma and corporate greed on food prices—augur well. Her campaign, at least, understands which way the wind blows.
Support independent journalism that does not fall in line
Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets.
Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.
As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war.
In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth.
The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more.
But this journalism is possible only with your support.
This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?
