Why John King Should Be Rejected as Secretary of Education

Why John King Should Be Rejected as Secretary of Education

Why John King Should Be Rejected as Secretary of Education

As a student at Syosset High School during much of King’s reign as New York State’s education commissioner, I saw firsthand the disastrous effects of his policies.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

When I learned that President Obama had formally nominated John King for the position of secretary of education, I was horrified and furious. As a student at Syosset High School during much of King’s reign as New York State’s education commissioner, I saw firsthand the disastrous effects of his policies on my peers, teachers, and community.

In May 2013, I wrote an op-ed for the The Nation detailing why I opted out of the state teacher evaluation tests. These tests were part of the new teacher evaluation system that put an inordinate emphasis on standardized test scores. A few weeks later, I gave a speech at a rally in Albany, where I directed some of my remarks to Governor Andrew Cuomo, Commissioner King, and then-Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch: “We’re coming for you. We’re taking back our children. We’re taking back our schools. We’re taking back public education from your hands and from the hands of corporations, billionaires, Wall Street, and testing companies. Wake the hell up.”

Over the past week, with the help of Carol Burris, the executive director of the Network for Public Education and a veteran principal and educator, and Monty Neill, executive director of the National Center for Fair & Open Testing (or FairTest; full disclosure: I serve on the board), I put together a letter calling for the US Senate to oppose the confirmation of John King and tell President Obama that he should nominate a candidate who supports equitable and progressive public education, not a corporate school reformer whose policies have been devastating to students, especially poor black and brown ones. I reached out to the leading scholars, writers, educators, and activists to see if they would consider signing the letter. I am humbled that many of my personal heroes, from Noam Chomsky to Jonathan Kozol to Naomi Klein, have endorsed this letter.

The Senate is expected to vote on King’s confirmation on March 9. I am making a crucial plea to all senators, particularly Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, to vote against John King. And I urge you to tweet, call, and email your senator and sign this petition.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x