What Happens When 85 People Are Worth the Same Amount as 3.5 Billion?

What Happens When 85 People Are Worth the Same Amount as 3.5 Billion?

What Happens When 85 People Are Worth the Same Amount as 3.5 Billion?

A new Oxfam report warns of the dangers of global inequality.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Here's a riddle: What do the eighty-five wealthiest people in the world have in common with the 3.5 billion poorest? Answer: the richest sliver possesses the same share of the world's wealth as its poorest half. Another startling fact? One percent of the world's families now possess 46 percent of the world's wealth. And another? Seven out of ten people live in countries where economic inequality has grown in the last three decades.

These and similar revelations are at the heart of "Working for the Few," a new report by Oxfam International about rising inequality. Released two days before this year's World Economic Forum, the global elite's annual high-altitude shmooze-fest, the report is a bracing look at the way the world's wealthiest have rigged the system, bending it into a "winner-takes-all" feedback loop to perpetuate their place at the top.

As laid out in the report, the rigging is made possible by this fantastic "ill-gotten" wealth ($110 trillion for the top 1 percent alone), which creates "political capture": the ability of elites to influence lawmakers to enact policies favorable to their interests. And that leads, in turn, to "opportunity capture," in which the best of everything, from healthcare to education, flows to the wealthy and their offspring. Then the cycle begins again.

This is a serious problem. As Oxfam's executive director, Winnie Byanyima, explains, "We cannot hope to win the fight against poverty without tackling inequality. Widening inequality is creating a vicious circle where wealth and power are increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few, leaving the rest of us to fight over crumbs from the top table."

To break this cycle, the report offers a roster of solutions aimed squarely at the privileged class: progressive taxation, an end to tax shelters, a living wage for workers, etc. They're all solid suggestions, with just one problem: many require the wealthy to use their political heft to advocate policies that run counter to their interests. Now there's a riddle waiting for an answer.

Time is running out to have your gift matched 

In this time of unrelenting, often unprecedented cruelty and lawlessness, I’m grateful for Nation readers like you. 

So many of you have taken to the streets, organized in your neighborhood and with your union, and showed up at the ballot box to vote for progressive candidates. You’re proving that it is possible—to paraphrase the legendary Patti Smith—to redeem the work of the fools running our government.

And as we head into 2026, I promise that The Nation will fight like never before for justice, humanity, and dignity in these United States. 

At a time when most news organizations are either cutting budgets or cozying up to Trump by bringing in right-wing propagandists, The Nation’s writers, editors, copy editors, fact-checkers, and illustrators confront head-on the administration’s deadly abuses of power, blatant corruption, and deconstruction of both government and civil society. 

We couldn’t do this crucial work without you.

Through the end of the year, a generous donor is matching all donations to The Nation’s independent journalism up to $75,000. But the end of the year is now only days away. 

Time is running out to have your gift doubled. Don’t wait—donate now to ensure that our newsroom has the full $150,000 to start the new year. 

Another world really is possible. Together, we can and will win it!

Love and Solidarity,

John Nichols 

Executive Editor, The Nation

Ad Policy
x